fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 个月前IF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzimagemessage-square128linkfedilinkarrow-up1499arrow-down112
arrow-up1487arrow-down1imageIF YOU TAKE ENOUGH YOU CAN SEE THE PATTERN BROmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 个月前message-square128linkfedilink
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 个月前That’s so many nested assumptions, lol: Assumption table Graduate student in academia Running a simulation for data For a conference Haskell The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0% Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·3 个月前Come on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
minus-squaremuzzle@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 个月前 Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
minus-squareLH0ezVT@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Yeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Our telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
minus-squareSupervisor194@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前 Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age. I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
minus-squareNaz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-23 个月前I know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.
That’s so many nested assumptions, lol:
Assumption table
The probability value of all four being true simultaneously approaches ≈0%
Don’t forget the sheer, mind-destroying size of the universe, and its age.
Come on, it doesn’t work like this. You can disprove the funny theory only if you give us an even more ridiculous one in it’s stead.
deleted by creator
Most of it is empty. The trick is lazy evaluation.
Yeah, it uses a simplified model unless you look too close. That’s how you get those funny quantum effects. Although, I have to say, great sativa, dude
Our telescopes eats up CPU cycles fast, the poor blokes cloud server will come with an unsuspecting bill this month…
I mean, if it’s really a simulation, all of that would be… simulated.
I know; I’m just fishing out counter-examples and counter-arguments.