they wouldn’t, but who cares why do you send money

I think that’s still dangerous for them. test customers could test their “compliance with law”, like they test whether they are accounting tax properly

I think they can. on reto one way to pay is to send some kind of a bank transaction. if they were actively looking into it, they would know the account numbers of the monero sellers, and by that they could punish those who send money to them

do you think it is possible to punish those accepting it as payment? and then, they can also always make acquiring it harder

I feel anger in that post title

No, it is privacy by default. You lock your BCH and mint the privacy token then all your activities are private from that point.

aaand since using the privacy token is optional, from the point I’m making qnd using it I’m suspicious.

it is only private by default if you wouldn’t need to convert/wrap/whatever BCH itself. those doing the conversion will stick out

This is the same as taking your fiat or another coin and buying Monero, after which your activities are private. So the same suspicion exists when you go from a non-private asset to a private one.

maybe I misunderstood something, but it sounded like you need to unlock the BCH to sendbit to someone. is that wrong?

also, for context this seems to be a 2 years old beef

Tl;Dr: eche|off remembers zlatin and sends him away even before he could have wrote any hateful thoughts. then zlatinb introduces himself and shows his hate towards everyone not a straight white male. then also sends messages that are just otherwise weird, and basically speaks with himself, like an insane abuser does at his ex’s house right after a breakup. and channel members just handle him accordingly, by not responding to him and waiting for him to calm down and go away

then he puts it in a paste, and announces it publicly and proudly.

but Xeha also has a few interesting points, if what he says can be believed

also, does his praise of the C++ i2pd mean that it’s devs have similar beliefs, or is it because they haven’t said any “woke” thing yet?

oh is it basically opt-in privacy then, like with zcash? where if you opt in to privacy you immediately become suspicious

does that mean that the video is a clickbait garbage with a lie as a title? sorry if I have repeated myself

perhaps systemrescue? It’s an arch based distro, but maybe built differently for better stability. it also does not attempt to start real graphics until you type startx

pressing the power button (to discharge all capacitors)

I think that does not happen anymore in modern PCs. I still always do it, but then I also wait a minute or more after pulling the plug

that sounds interesting, I should try it sometime

m… me? sorry for offending you. I prefer keeping my phone charged instead of letting it comlletely discharge. no I’m not living on it, I’m living on my desktop.

also I only read lemmy on the phone.

who tf lets their phone discharge midday. does the battery only last 2 hours?

yeah, honestly I would think veracrypt, a LUKS partition, or such would be a bigger factor

haven’t seen a single source so far for any claims, other then a justin timberlake clip disguised as a source

what happens exactly when you try to sleep it?

what does systemd-inhibit --list say when you can’t sleep it?

also, recently I learned that the system can’t sleep if a FUSE file system (like NTFS on linux) has file activity right when going down (e.g. a large file was being copied or written).
how did you install firefox, to where (which filesystem), and what ff version?

selfhosting libreoffice? what do you mean?

does it support promptless automatic update installation?