I am refering to the old school non-violence by the way, not the modern non-resistance crap. What are your toughts?

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Somebody else here, I think an issue might be that it’s people being under (presumably) immoral oppression lashing out with immoral means, so to try to stop them might itself be siding with the also immoral oppression. There’s something here about the goal and the means.

        • Sarah Valentine (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          The way I see it, the people lashing out are doing so because they were effectively forced to, which puts their behavior outside the bounds of moral judgement. Such judgement should be reserved for the ones who left those people with no other choice.

      • If you’re making someone do something by force then what they do can’t be defined as moral. It would be compliance with someone else’s wishes, not obedience to an internal directive. Therefore moral matters are for one’s own consideration and not something to beat other people into submission with.