• 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Seeding shouldn’t be done on ratios - being the only one seeding 10 seasons of a tv show and getting it to 0.4:1 is way more helpful than seeding the same movie as everyone else and getting to 20:1, you’re noy contributing anything there other than decreasing your bandwidth for things that aren’t already at 100,000% availability

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’d you are the only one seeding it and get to 0.4, you just left others hanging with incomplete downloads.

      However I do agree in general

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s what I’m saying

        It’s better to not even half-way seed a torrent with low availability than it is to seed one that everyone else is seeding, regardless of how high your ratio goes - it’s a point on how pointless it really is to waste your resources seeding something like that

    • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Seeding to ratios is self correcting, in my inexperienced opinion as I only share ISOs.

      Unpopular thing sits on someone’s computer (not mine) for ages just happily waiting until it’s useful. Popular thing is in and out. Purely for files intended to be churned; try a distro (in facebook’s case a book), use it, and delete it.

      1:3 could be said to be a minimum (1 for to pay back, 1 to pay forward, and 1 to pay for a leecher)

      Things that are going to be archived can be set as limitless as long as strain on hardware can be tolerated.