Just hypothetically, if a state decided to stop receiving money from the federal government as well as intercepting and/or stopping federal income tax payments, could they do it? What might the consequences be?

Please be respectful so that rule 5 doesn’t get broken.

  • WhereGrapesMayRule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Nope. What they could do is tax corporations that collect them at 100% of whatever they collect on behalf of the federal government and then have a state stimulus payment equal to what was collected.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    No, businesses directly pay the federal government. More insidiously, it’s impossible to opt out if you’re employed full time; you have to be self employed to get to decide when/if/how much tax you send the federal government.

    Apparently before 1943, people paid taxes individually once a year. Then a law was passed requiring their employers to do it regularly instead without their consent.

    • Probius@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I don’t mean legally. I mean “just doing it” regardless of the law.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        How would they “just do it”?

        Federal taxes do not go thru states. They go from taxpayer to federal government at tax time, and from payroll processor to federal government for withholdings.

        You want states out there hacking transactions?

        Most payroll providers aren’t based in the same state, and most corporations don’t only operate in one state. Hell, most are headquartered in Delaware.

        For the vast amount of Americans that money doesn’t touch any states besides Delaware.

        Like, there’s a lot of reasons why what you’re suggesting just can’t happen.

        • Probius@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          This is the answer I was looking for. Thanks! A simple “no” wasn’t very informative.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Not sure how this would work as most corporations aren’t isolated to a single state and they’re the ones sending your tax dollars to the feds via payroll deductions. I see this as being similar to banks who won’t allow dispensaries to have bank accounts since they’re still illegal federally even if it’s perfectly legal within the state.

        • Probius@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I guess it would, at most, only work with people who get paid from the same state.