• Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Which is a bit silly to me, in that any religious person could simply explain evolution away as the mechanism by which a god or gods created humanity (to iterate on form until creating their supposed “perfect image”).

      God being a human who was also his own father is fine, but the suggestion that evolution could be part of god’s plan is where we draw the line?

      • johsny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Could be, but evolution makes God redundant, and then it is the whole simplest explanation thing that kicks in, right?

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          No… not necessarily. Why can’t God command the creation of something and then allow the natural process to create said thing? Evolution doesn’t disprove the existence of God.

          • BitSound@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            At some point you’re advocating for Deism. Which is fine enough, but doesn’t really provide any satisfactory answers. You need to define exactly what you mean by “God” before any further useful conversation can be had.

            The scientific process, including evolution, has dispelled the myths found in any religious textbook ever written, including their particular definitions of “God”. I’d suggest you just drop the word and the associated baggage, and start from scratch. Come up with a new word, and define properties for it that make a coherent argument.

            • StaySquared@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Well for one, I would recommend you drop the idea of what is God from the Christian perspective, they’re clueless. That much is true. Islam is far superior in terms of intellect and sophistication, after all the Quran is the literal Word of God. Unlike the Bible, authored by pagan and anti-Christ men who had a liking to Egyptian mythologies.

              (Quran 21:30) Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the Earth were of one connected entity, then We separated them and We made every living thing out of water? Will they not then believe?

              (Quran 24:45) And Allah has created from water every living creature. Some of them crawl on their bellies, some walk on two legs, and some walk on four. Allah creates whatever He wills. Surely Allah is Most Capable of everything.

              (Quran 64:3) He designed you then made your design better.

              (Quran 40:64) He formed you then made your forms better.

              (Quran 71:17) And Allah has caused you to grow from the earth a [progressive] growth.

              (Quran 76:28) We created them and strengthened their forms.

              (Quran 82:6-9) O mankind, what has deceived you concerning your Lord, the Generous, Who created you, then proportioned you, and then balanced you; in whatever form He willed has He assembled you.

              Going to be blunt, if you read these verses (and there’s more verses) and don’t believe that this aligns with a creation of something, which in turn evolves (strengthens in its form) then it was meant to be. There’s nothing under the sun I could tell you that will pique your interest.

              God has Willed it. This is the way.

              • BitSound@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                He designed you then made your design better. He formed you then made your forms better. We created them and strengthened their forms.

                That’s not how any of this works. None of these require the process of biological evolution, they’re clearly written as the islamic equivalent of intelligent design. Those describe some wizard creating something and then working to make it better, which is the opposite of how biological evolution works. Relying on “evolves” having several different meanings (evolves (strengthens in its form)) is not an argument that is made in good faith. The process of biological evolution is not described in any religious literature, including yours.

                And Allah has created from water every living creature

                I assume you bolded this because it’s important somehow. It’s not, though. It’s a vague allegory that has no predictive power, is not science, and has nothing to do with the process of biological evolution.

      • halowpeano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        They had to reject it because any religion with a creation myth specifically says how the god created people. To accept an alternative story would reject the notion of the book as truth.

        The religious are not looking for answers, they already have all the answers by definition of their holy book or whatever. They’re looking for confirmation bias and reject anything that goes against that.

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If you’re talking specifically about the Abrahamic God, sure. But if it’s about the existence of any higher being, then there’s no contradiction here.