1950 feels kind of recent, but 2100 still seems super far off and futuristic.

    • De_Narm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Damn, I’m about a decade older than you and there’s no way I’d call 1950 recent in any way. For all I care, it’s just as much ancient history as the roman empire. I don’t know anyone alive from either period, at least not on a personal level.

      2100 on the other hand feels closer because I’m expect to come close to it within my lifetime. At least closer than I ever was to 1950.

      • seaside@reddthat.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have family members who were born in the 1920s and 1930s and are still alive today, which probably has a significant influence on my perspective on time.

        • De_Narm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s a fair point. My family isn’t exactly known for getting old. I didn’t even meet half my grandparents and the only one I really got to know only lived into my early teenage years. I’ll probably only get to around 70 myself.

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s a matter of perspective. When you study ancient history, the French Revolution is basically yesterday. When you don’t, a few of decades ago is nearly primordial times.

        I’m the former, and to me the 50s are very, very recent times.