"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 16 hours agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square284fedilinkarrow-up1366arrow-down118
arrow-up1348arrow-down1imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 16 hours agomessage-square284fedilink
minus-squaremister_flibble@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 hours agoYeah, the actual fork bit of 2 is nice but I don’t like utensils with dump truck ass; they’re top heavy when in use.
minus-squareAussiemandeus@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 hours agoNah just two all round
minus-squarepitiable_sandwich540@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 hours agoI agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…
Head of 2, body of 5.
This is the correct answer
Yeah, the actual fork bit of 2 is nice but I don’t like utensils with dump truck ass; they’re top heavy when in use.
This is the only correct answer
Nah just two all round
I agree, but if we could include the prong to base ratio of 4, that’d be great. I feel like 2’s head is to… idk, flimsy? Either the base should extend further or the prongs be shorter. Great shape otherwise though…
4 looks too spork like. No thanks