"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square441fedilinkarrow-up1545arrow-down131
arrow-up1514arrow-down1imageChoose a number, 1-5!lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square441fedilink
minus-squareulterno@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoThis seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread. Nice, glancing angles on the teeth Adequate distance between teeth (and unlike mine, the surface between the teeth has been properly smoothed out, making cleaning easier) Nice girth on the handle, making hard presses into the object doable without bending the neck Despite the girth, the handle shape with properly defined edges, reduces the DEX requirement of the user On top of that, you have chamfers and fillets on those edges, reducing pressure on the skin (which I didn’t even think to ask for) None of the form-over-function bs as is done in 2 This is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now. Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.
This seems to fit all the points I put somewhere else in this thread.
DEX
requirement of the userThis is even better than the fork that I have on my table right now.
Though that kink on the back end of the handle seems to trigger my OCD.