(Yes, of course I know that’s not the Enterprise-D and that TNG came out in 1986, but you try making a better debunking joke.)

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wasn’t 2001 also made at that time? As I recall, that was incredibly realistic (mostly), far more so than a cheap TV show

    (Not saying that 2001 is proof, just that ToS isn’t a great comparison)

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      2001 came out in 1968, so a year before the actual moon landing. As long as you were economical with your shots, you could definitely do some realistic-looking microgravity and spaceships with 60s tech - what you couldn’t do with 60s tech, as a commenter above pointed out, was a long flat shot of people moving convincingly on the lunar surface, which is what the Apollo films show.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        2001 came out in 1968, so a year before the actual moon landing

        Haha! So it was the test for how realistic they’d get it. I knew it!

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Similarly to the conspiracy that inspires this meme, the meme itself also doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.