• srestegosaurio@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    The verb “be” (in Spanish we have two of them btw, apparently it’s confusing as hell for foreigners details at the bottom) it’s usually very irregular in a ton of languages. I suppose because it’s one of the prime verbs and thus usage brings change.

    (“To be in a a place” -> «estar», “To be something” -> «ser»).

    Also, French (while having picky pronunciation rules I don’t think it’s that bad. Sure it sounds as if you were nasally congested but I like it. (Learned a bit in high school). As alsmot any other language I consider it to be better than the phonetical mess that it’s English.

    Bro, why can’t you have some fucking sense??

    I should have picked philosophy and linguistics instead of CS.

    ((This coment is a mess and I don’t have the energy to improve it, sorry))

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      Generally French speakers don’t consider English to be phonetically messy. Because when you pronounce every word with the thickest French accent known to man without any regard for correctness, suddenly the phonology becomes quite regular! (Side-effect being that native English speakers may not understand what the fuck a French speaker is saying, but that’s never stopped French speakers who famously disregard the English’s opinion on… well everything)

      What’s really annoying about French besides the needlessly complicated tenses is that it had a bunch of already archaic orthographic and grammatical rules 300 years ago or so, and at that point the aristocracy decided to freeze it in place. I won’t get on another rant about the Académie française but if a French word has an overly complicated spelling given its pronunciation, it’s these guys’ fault who have refused to enact any real reform since the early 1800s despite calls for it since at least the 1700s. Despite it supposedly being their jobs.