TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 天前Big Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comexternal-linkmessage-square384linkfedilinkarrow-up1556arrow-down110
arrow-up1546arrow-down1external-linkBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 天前message-square384linkfedilink
minus-squareGeometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·14 天前Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·14 天前Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·14 天前That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
minus-squareIhaveCrabs111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·14 天前Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-213 天前Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs 20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1
Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs
20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1