LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 days agoI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square489linkfedilinkarrow-up1807arrow-down179
arrow-up1728arrow-down1imageI dunnopiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square489linkfedilink
minus-squareTheRedSpade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·18 days agoHow can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
minus-squareVoroxpete@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-217 days agoThey didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case. But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·9 hours ago so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)
How can you be sure it’s not defined when we only see one line?
They didn’t say it’s not defined, they said it’s not a valid name. Most languages don’t allow function names to start with a number, so 5 literally cannot be a function if that’s the case.
But that’s assuming this isn’t some really obscure language.
No, but it can be and is a coefficient of the Term 5(8-5)