Well sure it’s been debunked but the myth is that a timeline jump means historical records are going to be different from your memory.
So the proof that Looney Tunes is a myth isn’t in historical documents but from my memory where I know it was Tunes because of Merry Melodies. My memory agrees with historical proof.
I’m waiting for the Lucas 50th anniversary edition of Empire where Vader shoots first.
Even that makes no sense. Public taxes were paying for science that is then exploited for free by businesses. It’s pure stupidity.
While it is nice in theory to eliminate all national borders, it’s not one wolf but a wolf pack. The pack is deciding democratically to respect the border of another pack.
Saying borders are “imposed by the state” is like a cub who ignores the pack, wanders into America and gets torn apart by nasty Americans.
The “state” is people.
I’d say it’s because Alexander is still such a very common name.
He’s asking why is it Alexander the Great but not Caesar the Great. If Alexander was so great, he wouldn’t need “the great” after his name. Alexander itself would be enough.
It answers questions.
I wouldn’t be annoyed as much if it wasn’t being forced. I do 3d modeling for 3d printing. Fusion 360 recently added an ai assistant. I’d be happy with it but it’s forced into a panel to the right of where object properties pops up. So mousing over to properties brings up the AI pop up if you aren’t extremely careful.
I’m sure the manager of the AI feature loves that they can show metrics that everyone is bringing up the AI pop up constantly. They don’t care that it’s pissing everyone off because they get their bonus not on pissing off customers but that their metrics look great.
So instead of being “Wow! This AI helped me fix a problem faster than searching Google.” It’s, “Freaking AI pop up in my way again!”
This doesn’t seem like a daily use but specialized for running/hiking. It’s like criticizing hiking boots for being uncomfortable and hard to lace compared to sneakers.
No Hanna Barbera? You should throw a few in to mix it up. Like a Snagglepuss, one Huckleberry hound, and one Yogi Bear. The first season of Scooby Doo is iconic. Josie and the Pussy Cats was good. 60’s Hanna would include the excellent Johnny Quest. I’d also throw in a singular Space Ghost and Herculoids to break things up.
Yes they are contradictory. The computer isn’t supernatural. The premise states the computer isn’t 100% accurate. It says 99.9% but it could say 75% without changing the problem. It says 99% to simplify the scenario for the reader so you assume the computer is accurate. The premise is the computer can reliably predict your behavior. The premise is not the computer can defy physics.
Martha Stewart Living, of course.
You said this:
“This necessarily includes the results of that coin flip and the Geiger counter readings.”
The premise states the computer sets up the boxes BEFORE you enter the room. The OP states he flips the coin AFTER he enters the room.
The computer cannot change the boxes after he entered the room. The computer cannot know the results of how you will respond to the coin flip because it happens AFTER it has fixed the boxes.
. This necessarily includes the results of that coin flip and the Geiger counter readings.
The OP said he flips the coin after going into the room. But the computer setup the boxes before they entered. So the computer knowing how you’d react to the coin flip can’t change the boxes.
There’s the possibility that there’s something else at play that we don’t know, and maybe cannot fathom.
The possibility that there is something hidden that we are not aware of is why Bell’s Theorem was such a revolution in physics. The experimental proof of Bell’s theorem won the nobel prize. There are no hidden variables. Probability is fundamental, not a result of some unknown process.
The premise wasn’t that the computer was 100% perfect. It was 99.9% perfect. That is its good enough such that you should assume its correct. The premise could have said 75% and it wouldn’t change anything. Saying 99% makes it simpler for the reader to assume that the computer is correct.
The computer is not supernatural. The premise does not say the computer is 100% accurate. The premise does not say that the computer can violate known laws of physics. The premise is that the computer knows your behavior.
Pedantic:
The three stars of orion are actually 9 stars. 1 is a trinary, one is a single star and one is a 5 star system.
HTML with CSS is Turing complete.
As someone who started watching Saturday morning cartoons in the 1960’s, I can definitely say the mid 90’s was peak cartoon.
I would think all the patents have expired but there have been dozens of new instructions added since the 2003 x64. In many cases there are two variants of the same instruction so if a 3rd manufacturer came in they could make their own too. They would need Linux and Windows on board for their variants.