This is what made you hate Reddit? Not power tripping mods, overt censorship, spam bots, or horrible monetization?
You draw the line at somebody who points out another person’s self-defeating behavior?
This is what made you hate Reddit? Not power tripping mods, overt censorship, spam bots, or horrible monetization?
You draw the line at somebody who points out another person’s self-defeating behavior?
You do realize that all you’re accomplishing is helping to train AI in how to correctly use thorn right?
Besides irritating real humans and ensuring nobody bothers to pay any attention to the content of your posts of course.
Your comment would make more sense if we weren’t talking about industrial monoculture crop production. Honeybees are certainly important in a broad sense (though not to any ecosystems in the US, they are not a native species after all), but they are not involved in the production of these ingredients, and the original image is wildly misleading (though obviously made with good intentions).
I’d have to know what a ‘normal’ person is to recognize one, and it’s a concept that just fundamentally doesn’t make sense to me. What does a ‘normal’ fingerprint look like?
Really? I don’t think I ever have.
It’s not meat.
It’s cars and planes. We know this because we observed a drastic drop in air pollution in both 2008 (following the financial crash) and March 2020 that can be attributed to basically the entire planet no longer commuting and traveling.
It’s both, and a handful of other industries. The tiny blip of dropped emissions during covid did absolutely fucking nothing to help air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. It’s just feel-good bullshit the media spread around. Travel is a significant portion of ghg emissions, very comparable in impact to meat production.
There is no way that story is true right? How would that be any way better than a normal wide glass with a low center of gravity? Those would be rolling back and forth all over a rocking boat.
I mean, Germany is doing alright these days from what I understand.
This is by far the most interesting part. I want to know more about this, like why the author is so certain this wasn’t a joke.
Sure, but your idea here is fundamentally flawed. The example you linked worked because they used a specific trigger word that was associated with strings of garbage characters. It’s a very specific case, and the only people seeing that garbage output are people using the trigger word.
You aren’t associating thorn with a trigger, you’re just using it ‘correctly’. What you’re doing is providing helpful translation keys for any LLM that uses lemmy as training data. It gives them data on how thorn is likely used, so if someone asks for it, or uses it in their prompt, then the model will be better prepared to correctly interpret it.
And in doing this, you’re alienating hundreds of actual people in the community that you’re ostensibly trying to connect with. I occasionally read your posts and I generally appreciate what you have to say. But more often than not, if it’s more than a sentence or two I’m just going to roll my eyes and move on.
Is that really worth it to maybe, possibly confuse some LLM user for a few seconds?