You will be surprised to learn not everyone lives in the EU ;)

There will be a ton of great privacy services that will be unaffected or will just leave the EU market (including signal). No need to switch to a completely unproven chat.

Sorry my bad, I should of responded in a more professional tone.

Yeah I totally agree there is a valid reason to have the function but its all moot if the function doesn’t work correctly.

Either you didn’t read the github comments or dont understand how vpns work.

If the VPN over hotspot function leaks data outside the tunnel, then your phones data is going to be revealed in the clear.

No offence but that’s terrible logic.

There is no point in using a vpn if you don’t care if your data leaks outside the tunnel.

It would be much better to just use a free VPN, like proton, on all devices instead and then just use the regular hotspot functionality.

Yeah Im gonna pass on the non audited chat with only 5 stars and stick to using signal.

LineageOS implementation of this is poorly done and will leak data outside of your VPN tunnel.

https://github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app/issues/4016#issuecomment-2422616515

I doubt it. I think OP wanted upvotes and didn’t read carefully. Something like “tor user de-anonymized via retired app” would of been more accurate.

This is another great lesson that even the best privacy tools can’t protect a user from their own bad opsec.

It just sucks as a lot of Lemmy users will just read the title and assume its true and then tell their friends tor is no longer safe.

Yeah not sure why OP felt the need to use such a click-bait title.

Thinking isn’t your strong suit

I think your misinterpreting your own social anxieties as being made to feel like an “outcast”.

The fact of the matter is it’s just not normal to question why a store wants your phone number and I’m sure the cashier was taken aback by the whole situation.

Convenience, not privacy, is the norm. There is going to be tons and tons of awkward social interactions when you go against social norms. Accept it and be proud your advocating for your privacy.

Its a pretty low bar but Android is going to be more private then Windows. Google having privileged access to your phone is still terrible but Windows doesn’t really have any privacy protections by default. Android at least does things such as sandboxing its non privileged apps. It also provides a lot better hardware security for your data then most Windows devices would…outside of secure core pcs its pretty trash for hardware privacy in the Windows world.

Yeah. The 2$/month port forwarding option can also be a great deal as well especially if combined with the lifetime pro memberships they used to sell for $30 back in the 2010s.

Mullvad, IVPN, and Proton are the top tier for privacy respecting VPNs.

Windscribe and AirVPN are also decent options but do not have the audit history to be in the same tier as the other 3.

Most other VPNs people mention either have a dubious history or no real proof of their claims to be privacy respecting.

Tor cant save you from bad opsec.

It sounds like they just report the number they are sure of at the time and update the filing later. Very high chance the number of affected is much more then 1.3M - the number of unique email addresses alone makes it pretty clear its more.

The situation doesn’t come without precedent either. It’s not uncommon for organizations disclosing data breaches with US state officials to update those filings down the line as investigations into potentially compromised data continue.

Would be basically impossible. Most of what is leaked these days is just rebundled from other leaks. For example if you listened to MB on this its only a small % of data from new leaks that actually ends being new info.

Any attempt of doing something like this would prove to be trash data pretty quickly and would not have a major effect.

That’s fair, and the reasons why someone buys a phone is a personal choice.

I would suggest with things like a headphone jack that, while its annoying to buy an adapter (usb-c to headphone) it may be worth the cost vs sacrificing something like hardware security.

Sadly a lot of the time consumers are forced to choose between security and privacy or convenience.

If the security benefits of a pixel is less important then the fact Google made it then GOS is simply not meant for you.

Its silly people complain about it being only compatible for pixels but never seem to blame other android brands for making significantly less secure phones. The responsibility should be put on phone makers to create secure phones that meet GOS requirements, not to expect GOS to make a less secure OS.

The whole AOSP environment is very Google centric so its pretty weird to think because your not buying a pixel that you are somehow avoiding Google.

Wrong guy. We agree. Try and read carefully.

Lol because there has never been an issue with randomized data. This also does nothing to alleviate the issue of privileged access. You are clueless.