I once dropped all of my chocolate on the floor. That was a waste of Daim.

It’s still too easy to install apps. You xan just type a parent’s password on the kid’s device to continue.

That was always the joke but some people prefer in-joles (i.e. already knowing they have identical faces) over being inclusive and showing the joke at face value. I can appreciate both, depending on finesse.

This joke doesn’t really have any finesse so my vote is for inclusivity.

With this as a guide, it would be enough if the task needed to be done twice per day to break even after five years.

It’s even worse when you can tell they really tried and still end up with spaghetti. Even mid- to senior developers do this. Rhe more senior they claim to be are, the more embarrasing when you have to get the stick.

Some people try to be so clever with fancy design patterns or bit-tricks, instead of just solving the problem, you now have two problems and a solution to one of them.

Starbucks isn’t Italian, for one.

You would have to pay off the 250 k debt though, if you want to keep the house. You can’t give the house away without paying the debt first.

The one inheriting the house may want to take a 250k loan to afford that 300k house.

I just wanted to add about the stares. Photos back then required the target to be very still ao they are just probably trying their best to keep still.

Most photos of children failed because they moved. These were very still, hence the tension in their eyes, or just a lucky shot. Anyways, photos from way back always look like death for this reason.

Most data can be de-anonymized with some clever tricks. I don’t know about Mozilla but the others definitely try to keep it just anonymous enough to later be correlated with the rest of your profile.

Edit: typos