He’d be wrong, almost every Russian mine can be modified to AP use by changing the fuse some even have two fuse ports, one for AT and another that’s anti tampering/anti personnel.

So we agree. Things can be neat and still have horrible purpose.

To be fair the b1 lancer is pretty fascinating, most military equipment is pretty neat honestly. The use of it is the problematic part.

Literally. The $200 is almost certainly the cost of the station breaker.

No, my name’s Dan.

That is the definition…, they’re used a single time and dumped into the environment. That’s what single use plastics are, I’ve legit never heard of anyone aside from you refer to glass as single use.

They say glass new and recycled but accept that a large amount of glass bottles still end up in the ecosystem.

I didn’t say it defined single use glass, that’s just a you thing. It defines sickle use for the article in which it is used solely to describe items that are used once and dumped into the ecosystem. It is specifically never referred to in reference to glass in the article.

That’s exactly what it says.

But as these bottles are largely single-use, many of them are discarded and dumped in the earth’s ecosystems, where they constitute a significant portion of all environmental waste.

They only counted recyclable bottles as single use if discarded anywhere but a recycling center assuming they may or may not be recycled so they assume it’s trash until it’s recycled or degraded.

They’re only single use if they aren’t recycled, the article states that as well.

I know, what I’m saying is no glass bottle is explicitly non recyclable there’s just a lack of ability to recycle in the us for whatever dumb business monster reasoning.

It’s mostly just the us that no longer have recycling for bottles. Most modern countries have automated collection machines.

It doesn’t, Israel is going to do whatever they want just as they always have. We’re they not aggressive yet, did I miss calm level headed Israeli sometime in the last 50 years? No?

Iran never intended to strike with authority, they struck back because they are intended to, they didn’t want involved and now they have every reason not to be.

Iran isn’t now not has it ever truly been a moderating influence in Israel.

There’s no change to the math, even without the us Israel is more than equipped to lay siege to Gaza for the foreseeable future and Iran had no intention of getting involved.

Removed by mod

No I mean they can intercept Israeli missiles and they aren’t Israeli controlled.

Not really. Iran wants an excuse to sit it out and they just got it.

What it will do is give the us more intelligence agents in the ground figuring out what the actual duck is going on.

We don’t care about isrealis killing ours. Neither attacking a ship nor running a civilian over with a bulldozer raised too much issue.

I’m not opposed to this one honestly, it’s defensive and Israelis are quite literally holding the world hostage in a way that every other nuclear power simply implies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

This is just weird revisionist history. They moved in stole shit, colonized and murdered. The after the fact excuse of “we took it to preserve it” doesn’t play mostly because their colonizer bullshit is largely the reason areas they stole shit from are destabilized.

Needs a French version as well, they still allow active trade of stolen native objects.

Bro. They aren’t even saying you’re wrong here. They’re saying it’s their sub, stop the bias check because your literally just supplying people with your bias. If it were ai you’d have more of a point but it’s quite literally your opinion based on your references and they don’t want that.

Stop crying and certainly don’t lash out with idiotic and frankly weird commentary on it being somehow antisemitic for people to think critically on their own.

Specifically they never said you couldn’t post your references and your opinion just don’t call it a fact check.

Or use them as a weapon in a bank robbery or something.