Lol, at 22 your body is not even finished, let alone your mind, but you think it’s mandatory to have sex?
And sex early is a better “decision”?
And being different is something to feel bad about and that is worth shame?
What the heck are you on dude, there is not a single angle at which this reasoning would even remotely make sense.
Don’t write this out of the weird 4chanish incel hellhole you found that cra.
Not so much no
Conservatives are defined by the need to burn it all down. The point is that they see a horrible past as glorious, torture as duty, and war as peace.
It doesn’t matter who dies or whatnot, everything is just a tool towards this goal, not the actual motivation behind it.
Your whole logic is based on the idea that being able to do something means understanding that thing. This is simply wrong.
Humans feel emotions, yet they don’t understand them. A calculator makes calculations, but no one would say that it understands math. People blink and breathe and hear, without any understanding of it.
The concept of understanding implies some form of meta-knowledge about the subject. Understanding math is more than using math, it’s about understanding what you’re doing and doing it out of intention. All of those things are absent in an AI, neural net or not. They cannot “see the world” because they need to be programmed specifically for a task to be able to do it; they are unable to actually grow out of their programming, which is what understanding would ultimately cause. They simply absorb data and spit it back out after doing some processing, and the fact that an AI can be made to produce completely incompatible results shows that there is nothing behind it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_sequence
With your logic, these numbers understand grammar too because they can form sentences.
Even better, anything that any human could ever say is contained in those, and as such, humanity has a more limited grammar understanding than a sequence.
You cannot define understanding by the results, and even if you did, AIs give horrible results that prove that they do nothing else than automatically put words next to each other based on the likelihood of it making sense to humans.
They do not understand grammar just like they do not understand anything, they simply are an algorithm made to spit out “realistic” answers without having to actually understand them.
Another example of that is AIs that generate images: they’re full of nonsense because the AI doesn’t understand what it’s making, and that’s why you end up with weird artifacts that seem completely absurd to any human with basic understanding of reality.
Yeah no
Nah, there is overall progress in a roguelike, not in capitalism
An RPG is supposed to get increasingly hard, as the characters have to face more serious and important difficulties.
What you’re talking about is just capitalist bullshit, the equivalent would be finishing a quest and your reward is that they erase your save, give you a little badge or something and you have to start the game again.
Messy code by humans generally isn’t logical because it went through multiple modifications/deletions that are not visible anymore.
I’m not sure that bad devs are much better than AIs, and they’re the ones using them to code now. I think the problem stems from not giving a shit about code making sense, and AIs just increase the problem.
I mean, I saw code that was essentially saying things like “if True == False” and when asking about what the purpose of the block was to the original dev (who wasn’t even such a bad dev), they just had no idea. Humans are chaotic and nonsensical and messy code comes from that, not from a weird logic, and you can’t comprehend it most of the times because it’s a mix of confusion, lack of planning, mistakes and laziness.
Fascism is growing. New communication media are allowing for large scale, in-depth brainwashing.
People now strive more than ever to be part of the “norm” and eliminate all the rest. Capitalism keeps everyone so busy and self-centered that morals disappear. “Charismatic leaders” spearhead the new trends in a sect/religion approach.
It’s not stupidity of the masses. It’s an engineered death spiral, where the stupid people are the ones engineering it thinking that if it’s good for them, it is good.
Then all hope is lost and there is absolutely no point in fighting, all it will do is annoy people who try to read your messages.
If writing weird can have an impact on the world, I’m sure a lot of other things can too.
That moment when you are so deep into capitalist shit you start making motivational quotes not about talent, morals or well-being, but about money.
You really need to reach a deep and pathetic level of stupidity to actually believe something like that
Or just a vain attempt at stopping a tornado by blowing on it.
Laws are what are needed, not writing weird.
Well, frankly it makes it quite annoying to read.
And I don’t know how much of an effect it would have on an AI, also.
Considering AIs are mostly a sect now, it doesn’t seem so unlikely.
No it’s not. At most, you can use it combined (“male worker”) but no one normal says “a male” except when talking about animals. People who use it like that for humans are generally a big red flag.
And you don’t learn to use “mal” and “female” when you learn english, you only find that in toxic masculinity environments.
The good old red flag of talking about “males and females” instead of men and women like a normal person with a brain.
Because politics are not science and people are very weird when it comes to children and education.
You cannot seriously believe that a country doing something gives it any kind of credibility, right?
Trans “treatments” (hormonal, surgery, etc) are one of the best remedies for a psychological issue. In medical views, the amount of people de-transitioning actually prove that the solution to gender disphoria and such (I easily get confused with the exact terms, apologies if I’m making a mistake with wording) is to let people transition.
In comparison, treatments for other problems (like depression, personality disorders, etc) are much much less successful.
The idea that transitioning should have a 100% satisfaction is absurd and coming from far-right propaganda.
I don’t really get why it matters.
Would it have been less shocking if we were talking mice? Or talking snakes? Most species communicate one way or the other, a lot of them through sounds, that’s pretty common.
Unless the confusion is about humans being “apes” but then again, I don’t see why it would be so shocking.