The Octonaut

That would have been a great article to post here a year ago

Much better. Please do stick to the pictogram communication, saves everyone time.

Well given that I’m neither American nor particularly aligned to Washington Post (I had to Google “wapo”) or the New York Times, it wasn’t a particularly interesting question. Having lived by the South China Sea however… yeah it’s probably more pertinent to my interests what Yogibear posts about that.

Did you forget your image macro?

I guess we’ll find out when Yogsy posts them some day.

Do we post opinion pieces on news communities now?

I think there’s some useful context, if not a good defence of this story.

It’s one of the original stories told by Reverend Awdry told to his 2 year old, measles-ridden child in 1942 war-era England (Wait, is this making it worse?).

Awdry would sing/recite old poems to Christopher, who then pressed him for further details that turned into a story.

For example, the opening of that episode of Thomas features the Limerick that prompted the story, which was around at least since 1902:

In the original story by Awdry, there is only a single tunnel, and the train is completely blocking the line and essentially ruining a business. So stubborn is the engine, that they have to dig a new tunnel beside the old one. The rails are removed and “a wall” are placed in front of the tunnel, for safety - to prevent trains literally running into the wrong tunnel and crashing. The Fat Director/Controller is also pretty unsympathetic deliberately - he commands people to push and pull the train out without success, but doesn’t himself help - “My doctor has forbidden me to push”. However the original books follow the realities of steam engine and railway operation far more closely than the TV series did (and as a result, the original series, closer to the books, were far more realistic than the later ones).

As portrayed in the TV show it definitely comes off more villainous. But in the original telling we have to take away 70 years of Thomas trains having faces, personalities, relationships and familiarity. When originally told, the Henry story didn’t even take place in the same “universe” - there was just 3 abstract stories about trains, loosely based on old rhymes and news stories.

I think he deserved it, don’t you?

Agile is explicitly a way for a team to be self-organising. What benefit do you get from it as a solo developer?

How is your wife doing by the way

1. What, lol. China doesn’t kidnap foreign businessmen.
2. “Their” equipment was 51% (at least) owned by a Chinese company. Of course they can’t literally steal it.
3. “They considered crime”
4. They were going to buy the equipment again… from China anyway? lol

Tell your boss get off the Trump juice.

The problem is that you don’t know what a pronoun is. You should try writing a sentence with common pronouns first and see if your sentence makes any grammatical sense. For instance “is <name> to understand that…” doesn’t work, because “is me/I to understand” doesn’t work. You would instead say “Am drag to understand”, which while sounding a bit odd is at least actually writing in English.

Your gimmick doesn’t work, Drag. You’re even having tk say “Drag’s”, which is literally how third person possessive plurals work. Find another thing to draw attention.

This guy’s gimmick is to speak about himself in the third person. You can safely block him.

I’m pretty sure he means Americans, collectively. Not sure why you think anyone would believe Hezbollah wanted every Muslim dead after 9/11?

Probably not, this is a dispute about profitability.

I don’t, because a single individual committed a crime, and got punished for it. Not sure what you think was obvious about this.

Country?

Country?

All physical touch is essentially electromagnetism

Can I ask what I’m sure everyone is thinking, how are any of those things improved by being tiny?