Personally, I think that, when it comes to “important” stuff, having an individual or group whose opinion you trust based on other aligned values is sufficient.

E.g., if you’re not sure how to feel about furries, but you respect the consensus of the queer community, you can look to them to decide how to ensure your actions/words align with your values

This is basically the whole point of electing representatives. It’s not your job to have an opinion on every single thing- we hire people with whom our values (ideally) align, and it becomes their job to have all those opinions

This works similarly in elections. Many people don’t have the time, energy, and/or capacity to sit down and learn about each proposed amendment/etc, so different groups publish their recommendations

Holy hell, 95% of people can’t figure out “what percentage of the emails sent by John Smith last month were about sustainability.” That is absolutely wild to me, and I already thought my perception was skewed the other direction due to working with largely disadvantaged people. That’s an eye opener for sure, thanks for sharing

As a 24/7 autist (and specialist)- can confirm.

Anon is mistaken about the “stutter” though; it sounds more like palilalia. Both of which have a low prevalence rate (<10%) so it’s weird that anon calls it “classic.”

Granted, the whole story is probably fake anyway

Does infodumping count?

Without more information, it’s hard to say. Medical conditions like thyroid disorders, or substance use could play a role. Psychologically, those symptoms could be attributed to anxiety or trauma related disorders. You may find it helpful to start by keeping notes about when/where/etc these bouts occur, as there may be underlying patterns that you haven’t noticed yet. I would recommend doing some reading on “emotional flashbacks” and consider whether you relate to what you find

Eternity does

I glanced at your username after reading this and thought it said PregoBoi lol

walks over to co-workers, farts, then walks back to his chair

Lmao

It’s common grammar in the states, and considered grammatically correct under Black American Vernacular English

If I ate something in silence, my partner would likely notice something was off immediately. The sound of even my own chewing (mouth closed, ofc) triggers my misophonia

I wasn’t asking you. I don’t have a problem blocking you

Hell yeah, I’m so ready to fight

I’m surprised to see an antinatalist support Harris. Seems morally inconsistent, though perhaps not from a consequentialist perspective. I’ve been blocking everyone sharing your sentiment, but I don’t wanna block one of the few antinatalists here, so I’m commenting instead

Is Harris’ loss my fault because I voted for De La Cruz? She could have easily earned my vote, but tried to court centrists and conservative voters instead.

Nice try, feds

Edit: this is not the best place for this very important discussion. Get on Matrix/Signal/XMPP, and get involved locally. This is a ‘no phones meeting’ kind of topic

I like this a lot better with “we.” It feels more empowering

Rats- you’re not acting fun stupid anymore, now its just annoying stupid, so I’m gonna move on.

Thanks for the good time!

160

Lol

add racism

Bruh. Like I could know you’re a racial minority.

I don’t get people banned

Respect, honestly. A few tweaks and you’re basically an anarchist already

Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.

Hey, you’re the one that told me to “fucking read” when you can’t read timestamps. Idk what to tell you

Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

You said “so no laws?” And I said “right.” That’s pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

Fear not, I’m also part of plenty of other nonsense

If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

Lol

Little of what you’ve said makes much sense, so I had no way to know

Let’s make a few things clear:

• You started this by attacking me.
• I think you’re not only simply uneducated (understandable given the severe dyslexia), but also legitimately lacking cognitive abilities expected of persons with an IQ of at least 100.
• I don’t like you; I have been mean to you on purpose, and I think it’s funny to fuck with you because you’re such a little bitch about it
• This continues to be an entertaining activity for me. You’re like a dancing little monkey. If this isn’t entertaining for you, you should stop responding.
• If you’d like to stop now but feel like a winner, feel free to report this comment- there’s a good chance it gets me banned. (Rule 1- be civil and nice)

Also- check timestamps. I edited that comment when your other reply came through, and responded over there.

Huh? I initially said “right.” Which means “correct”/“yes.” You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn’t offer an explanation?