I didn’t say “unpunished or hard to enforce”.

Well, we’d have to be more specific about what parts of the “user experience” we’re talking about here in order to make that assessment.

I’m mostly talking about discoverability, the default algorithms, the lack of federation, and a way to actually filter content by language.

I really don’t think it is.

The two biggest issues are actually not software related

I disagree, the biggest issues are related to discoverability, and most certainly software-related.

Peertube has the issue that its not very popular, so creators have to really plug their stuff.

Not necessarily. They only need to agree to allow an instance to mirror their content, and possibly one day contribute something to it in the event that it becomes popular enough. For now, consent is really all that’s required. The only revenue they’re missing out on is AdSense.

Its not profitable for creators UNLESS they add a way to monetize. Some argue that with secondary sources such as patreon, its not an issue, But I just don’t see it.

Patreon is one of many different ways to generate revenue. Most popular Youtubers are diversifying in various ways. The most effective of which is creating their own products and using their channels to promote them. Affiliate links/codes is another way smaller creators can diversify.

I like the ability to post my videos and get comments without getting flagged for whatever on Youtube.

As always, with freedom comes abuse. Youtube has a lot of regulations that can be cumbersome but also can protect creators and users.

Hosts and users who want their stuff available to their audience without YouTube’s bullshit.

sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

Been on that list since he became a CEO

Some content lends itself well to written format. Lots of content does not.

PeerTube is just software. It’s a decentralized network. It doesn’t have to scale to that size. You can have a million servers handling the storage and streaming in a more efficient method and democratize the bandwidth.

User experience can be improved pretty easily.

The important parts are already there.

No one wants to talk about PeerTube?

It’s always been legal to download, but not upload.

I bet counting on Nvidia is going to fuck them. Such a weird choice when EVERYONE else has switched to AMD.

I’m very interested on how powerful this thing is if it’s price is going to be higher than the LCD Steam Deck

From a purely hardware standpoint, the Steam Deck LCD panel is awful, 800p/60Hz with no VRR. Switch 2 is 1080p/120Hz w/ VRR. We don’t know much about the Switch processor but surely it is at least comparable to the original SD one with those sort of screen specs.

Steam Deck has to be sold at cost at the lowest, mostly because it’s just a PC and can be (and has been) used for a myriad of things that don’t involve Steam. Nintendo could sell these things at a huge loss and still make money hand over fist because they can’t do anything but play Switch games.

BUY A TESLER

“Spying” implies the user doesn’t know about it.

Virtually every platform collects this information, partly as a service to the user, so I don’t think it’s completely ridiculous.

One thing I do appreciate about Nintendo is that it works completely offline so if you don’t want them to have any info about you, you can keep it.

Well that’s what I meant by “out” but yes.

Lead-acid battery OEMs are also allowed to market Ah on batteries with a 50% DoD…

Lots of people don’t realize lithium is actually cheaper because of this

I don’t want them to go bankrupt, I just want Elon out.

I think it’s important to call out inattentive drivers while also calling out the systems and false advertising that may lead them to become less attentive.

If these systems were marketed as “driver assistance systems” instead of “full self driving”, certainly more people would pay attention. The fact that they’ve been allowed to get away with this blatant false advertising is astonishing.

They’re also obviously not adequately monitoring for driver attentiveness.

Then what are?

“Ownership” can mean a lot of different things

Why wouldn’t the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell be requirements for ownership?

Why would they be?

If “ownership” doesn’t have a unified meaning, then I can interpret “ownership” as the ability to maintain/repair, modify or resell the bought item.

You can “interpret” whatever meaning you want, that doesn’t make it accurate.