For the sake of brevity, I’m just going to agree that I’m sea-lioning.

Now, explain how what I’m doing is unethical.

Do you think it’s unethical because it uses stolen art?

If so, I don’t think there’s an issue because I’m not publishing anything I generate.

Do you think it’s unethical because of the electricity usage?

If so, you could make the argument about any frivilous activity which generates electricity.

I really don’t know of a compelling reason besides these two which raises a red flag for you.

I’m not trolling. Why is it unethical for me and my buddies to generate images of a duck with the head of an elephant?

I want to know more.

How long has it been since your coma?

When you say you were lucid, do you mean you were always aware you were dreaming?

You say there was no escape, but you must have become fully unconscious at times?

Did you ever have pleasant dreams?

How much of your life experience do you think shaped your nightmares?

Did you have any epiphanies due to the clashing ideas?

I meant to reply to you, to illustrate it’s not always unethical; a point you raised, not OP.

I use it when I get stoned with my mates and think of funny shit to generate.

I think they meant the giver.

Both my partner and I answered the same.

The ball was the size of a tennis ball, no colour.

The person had no gender or any distinguishing features.

The table was a standard kitchen table.

Neither of us knew what the test was about.

You can’t trick me, I know a bullet hell when I see one.

(Not my art)

Find a partner who looks similar to Crush, replace their wardrobe with virtually identical clothes to Crush, along with haircut, perfume, etc.

Constantly visit shops close to Crush’s house, so it’s “coincidence” when you bump into Crush and Partner.

From there, before they can talk their way out of an awkward situation, joke about how they look like twins, and that fantasy has always appealed to you.

Because.

Get a load of this guy, peeling their apples, grapes and tomatoes.

I do the same with rats

The problem is that the “thing” is either:

• never have I ever done this <thing> or
• <never have I ever done this thing>

That’s what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

Never have I ever heard “I’m proud of you” from my Dad :'(

It’s regrettable that it became part of “psychology 101” (in a general sense).

Can you imagine how much misinformation is piggybacking off these “facts” about human nature?

I’m no George Bush fan, but in his defence:

Point 1: the implication is the US are thinking about how the enemy will harm them

Point 2: he is convinced the purpose of war is to establish peace

Point 3: he probably meant "to catapult over the propaganda

Point 4: ya dun fukt up

Point 5: ya dun fukt up 2 George Bush Junioroo

Point 6: (yes, i know it’s hypocritical) he’s right tho lol

Point 7: heh heh

You’re not making the point you think you are.

I understand the implications of both.

I don’t truly call Australian Aboriginals “Australians”, I was being facetious.

Also, I call them “Native Americans”.