

It’s apparently enough justification to get people to consent to having their doorbell cams used for surveillance by 3rd parties 🫠


It’s apparently enough justification to get people to consent to having their doorbell cams used for surveillance by 3rd parties 🫠
I have a pair of slip-ons I’ll throw on when i need a quick trip outside


Why do they always have such punchable faces?


Ahhhh, not what i was looking for! 🫠 Guess that’s what i get for asking a kaiju for PC components though 😅 I’ll have to remember this for next time


Mr. Godzilla, i would like one RAM please 🙏


So this is how the Republicans are normalizing pedophilia. There are too many Republicans (and donors to them) to put away (given the ‘rich people don’t generally get punished for crimes’ axiom we live with), so they slow-roll the whole thing to “frog-boil” the masses into simply accepting that rich people sexually exploit children, and it’s been going on for a very long time…and that nothing is ultimately going to be done about it. If our president was one of the most active visitors, and he was still elected despite that information–i guess it can be argued we’ve already crossed that line.


Which is really it’s purpose, as far as i can see
Instead of the frowny face, it should be RFK’'s leather mitt face with a shit-eating grin


Demonstrators launched the protest at Cities Church, where pastor David Easterwood heads up an ICE field office in Minnesota.
I simply can’t wrap my head around the idea that this pastor is helping ICE. That must not be a Jesus church because if there’s any one thing i can rest assured of: Jesus would smite that asshole for what he’s doing. That is not a real Christian.


Oh, there’s efficiency–just in the wrong place. He efficiently made a 4% bump in Tesla stock value by telling a few lies. That’s all this is, and has been: profiting on hype/fomo.


Why aren’t there harsher penalties for behavior like this? They’re given 4 weeks to comply, and then all is fine as long as they stop? Seems like the message they’re sending is “you can track our kids, just be more careful not to get caught next time… If you do, you can at least rest assured that there’s no real punishment”


Gotta love this whole schtick, “oopsie! We weren’t careful enough with your personal info–here’s a voucher for free protection after the fact, because we failed to provide it to you when it mattered” (with the connotation that you should have taken them up on that free protection last time a corp accidentally shared your personal data with the world, and perhaps you wouldn’t be in this mess!)
…and that’s it! Business as usual after nearly a million people have their personal info compromised. As long as this is the punishment, it’s simply a business expense at worst.


“where’s the Tylenol?!”
But it is ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I’ll hear you out if you care to elaborate though.



Why don’t you tell him then?


You raise an excellent point, one which i was hoping to find out more about as well. It turns out Tesla has been working hard to keep pretty much any pertinent information to answer your questions firmly under lock and key.
From this Electrek article https://electrek.co/2025/11/17/tesla-robotaxi-had-3-more-crashes-now-7-total/
Unlike other companies reporting to NHTSA, Tesla abuses the right to redact data reported through the system. The automaker redacts the “narrative” for each reported crash, preventing the public from knowing how the crashes happened and who is responsible.
Based on the limited information in Tesla’s reports, we know that one of the new crashes involved a Robotaxi driving into a car backing up, another involved a cyclist, and the last one involved an unknown animal.
So he’s basically fudging the numbers and anytime he’s questioned he points at the fudged numbers and says everything’s great, he’s great, now get out of the way while he deploys a fleet of these un-manned deathtraps to “half the US population” according to a properly ultra-super-inflated kind of claim only a douchebag like Leon can make. No, seriously–he actually claimed that by the end of 2025 he’ll have these things serving half the population of the US.
🫠


I found this part to be even more alarming:
All of the Robotaxi crashes so far have occurred with human safety monitors—who have been trained to take control of the car in the event of a software error—present in the vehicles.
This is significant because, as TechCrunch reported on Monday, Tesla is starting to send out its Robotaxi fleet without safety monitors.
So despite a pitiful record with people trying to correct the cars mistakes, they’re now ready to move on to running them without assistance?!? I am furious at the idea that our safety on the roads is this negotiable.


Well if Susan isn’t being compensated several million dollars a year, what incentive would she have to help cancer patients? 🫠
I consented to that when i accepted the EULAs on all the stuff i signed up for online over the years. I’m not consenting to this though! 😉