This sure clarifies the circumstances. I appreciate the explanation and went on to verify the claims.

Here are the corresponding Etherscan-links to spare others the hassle:

1. [0x2274] MONEROCHAN creation
2. [0x2274] Uniswap funding / locking
3. [0xB9A1] Buying 789,420,933 (at time of writing)
4. [0xB9A1] Burning of 383,913,580 (at time of writing)

So far I couldn’t detect any discrepancies. Note that, on Blockchair, whale.monerochan.eth appears to resolve to 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000, while airdrops come from 0x4642, after being funded by 0xB9A1.

Thank you for the onboarding!

The text has some … “orange” flags.

For example, burning 25% doesn’t make sense when you decided on the supply to begin with and “100 % fair distribution” isn’t possible in the given scenario.

But then again, meme coins are all about not making sense, and some play may actually lead to the desired exposure. Let’s get Monero some marketing:

0xe746433469235aB0D5cc404b592C9634eF2ECB1D

It does make sense that the tables are for Monero-exclusive applications. Loaded GUI’s lead to user confusion and thus errors.

Think absolute beginner: “I installed that secure app you recommended and bought <thatothercoin> and happily transacted and now you say that wasn’t secure?!”