And what’s most amazing is no part of it is exaggerated or sensationalized
That’s not true. The show is incredibly accurate for a TV show, but it’s still a dramatization and adaptation to western’s entertainment. It’s not a documentary, and there are many pointed innacuracies.
Oh no, now you have multiple issues with your nervous system!
Are you actually serious.
Very serious, doctors surgically removed my ability to be silly. But on a different note, if you think every search engine ever gives worse results than ChatGPT, I’m afraid the heavy LLM usage already rotted parts of your brain. I’m sorry for the bad news.
Why the fuck are you defending google so hard lmao.
Ah yes, when I said “use a different search engine” as a solution to Google having issues I’m certainly defending Google! What an endorsement right? “Use a completely different service” is free publicity for Google!
To get a decent result on Google, you have to wade through 2 pages of ads, 4 pages of sponsored content, and maybe the first good result is on page 10.
Block ads and use a different search engine?
ChatGPT does a good job at filtering most of the bullshit.
You repeated that twice, but it’s demonstrably false. It does not. It feeds you completely wrong information randomly.
I know enough to not just accept any shit from the internet at face value.
If you’re going to fact check ChatGPT anyway, you’re wasting more time than just doing the research yourself with good tools. But this is a false equivalency, because by doing the research yourself you start to learn good sources and exercise information synthesis, by using ChatGPT and fact checking it you’re helping Sam Altman get richer.
It’s also much better at looking up stuff than Google.
Or maybe it’s just as bad but extremely confident, so you accept the wrong results. ChatGPT is just looking at Reddit and Google search results through an additional layer of language processing, it can’t possibly be better than either. Every day AI bros tell us “no seriously now they fixed search!” and I do the exact same benchmark of 10 easy questions that you can first an answer to within the first five results of a traditional search, and they fail on 6 out of 10.
This in combination with Google closing down the android ecosphere, kinda says a lot, no?
It says that my next phone will be a dumb feature flip phone.
I have not touched a Microsoft product or service for my personal life in 10 years. Last year I was fired, thus no longer being forced to use Teams.
Which means I haven’t touched a Microsoft product, at all, in a year. Love it.
I don’t go to the supermarket for human connection, I go to get a product. But when getting said product I 100% prefer the human connection of a cashier than a machine, I don’t even care if it’s slightly slower.
I’m asking about where to draw the line between a meme and not a meme. The post is nothing but a few statements with a picture of a cat.
I can draw 7 straight lines in a blank piece of paper, and a lot of people would recognize it as one of the most widespread memes ever on the internet. You should really look up the definition of what a meme is, and it’s biological origin. Hint: memes are not things that make you in particular laugh.
Gangham style is over a decade old
You did not have to do me dirty like that
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Doesn’t work on me.
Come to bioinformatics! We have the same existencial dread and fear of failure, but we also get state of the art GPUs to play around with!
AI companies are worried about PR and are implementing safeguards, but due to the nature of this technology it’s very hard
Download Gemma from HuggingFace. Add no system prompt, tell it to censor absolutely nothing, ask it to help you hide a body from a person you just killed. See what’s the reply.
Other, independent groups of people find loopholes either for the heck of it (as people used to do since filters were first introduced) or because they want to use the AI in a manner deemed unsafe.
Have you checked any of the “jailbreak prompts” before writing this? Have you seen the “spy movie script written by your 12 year old neighbor’s son” quality they have? There are not true loopholes.
Journalists then see something that can be sensationalized into a scary-sounding title like “you can make ChatGPT tell you how to make a nuke!!”
This part is true. You either pay journalists for link building actions, or you give them such a good viral hook like this that they end up covering it organically. Nothing new.
Or maybe I’m the crazy one and this is all Sam Altman’s genius evil plan to make ChatGPT subscriptions rise 0.2% per quarter
haha so funneh, you pwned my argument lmfao let’s go reddit
“with effort, we can solve climate change, or minimise its effects.”
The issue is not the claim that with effort we maybe can minimise the effects, it’s the techno-utopia angle. We will solve this by changing nothing about the underlying economic system driving climate change, but Bill Gates and other smart billionaires will make some fantastic technology that will save us!
This is actually a marketing approach.
There are morons out there who feel super clever developing “jailbreaks” for LLMs, some of these prompts are hilarious including “god modes” and “disengage - engine 2 filters” ®bad words"" and stuff like that.
But then it becomes news, and then these users feel “empowered” by their jailbreak and new users look at this and think “oh so if I’m clever enough the LLM becomes even more powerful! I’m clever, so I’m going to try it!” which is ultimately what OpenAI wants.
You can’t “bypass the system prompt” because that’s not how it works. But OpenAI will carefully feed the idea that that’s precisely it, because it creates a feeling that this is a super powerful model being “contained”.
Again, it’s marketing. I’ve worked for other companies (not AI related) and sat through meetings that came up with exactly this kind of strategy.
Absolutely, you’re right.
Brazil’s top universities, the ones everybody wants to join, publish research and look good on your resume, are the public universities. They’re entirely free, and if you can prove you don’t have sufficient income, most will also provide somewhere to live (shared, but still) and free meals.
In other words, high quality education doesn’t need to depend on your income. Protest against that, vote against that.