Did I say CIA, Mossad or other imperialist state were not involve ?

I pointed out that you couldn’t pretend defending the working in class when denying its agency. The movement “jin, jîyan, azadî” started way before the US and Israel operations (2022); kurdish people are organizing for their freedom even before the 1st war of Irak, and one of the few example of real socialism (democratic confederalism).

Yep, the imperialist state try to use those movement; the responsibility of the revolutionary movement inside those imperialist state is to fight the imperialism of their own state, not saping the revolutionary movement in other state

• Marx : “the freedom of the workers will be accomplish by the workers themselves”
• Workers fighting for freedom
• Marxist : “It’s CIA !”

okay that seem to be coherent. We are used to define imperialism as “the system produce by the competition between states”. Some domination are note linked (or loosely) with market.

I understand why it’s interesting to focus on things we can fight on. But a lot of us couldn’t fight the financial market and it’s exportation. However we could blockade exportation of weapons, sending medic kit or foods to people that suffer from domination.

I’m not saying your definition is wrong, I’m saying that I found it ineffective for an international solidarity of the working class

so it’s possible, once

Ecological, social, economic issues and the answer is on the legal site. FOSS as usual I guess

Both are translated “tortue” in french However to be fair, it could be specified “Tortue marine” and “Tortue terrestre”

and that’s why sex workers made their unions too

All work is done through coercition Some coercition are worst than other, but the all the worst one are not only in sex works. Fighting for emancipation is done by the workers themselves, not aqainst them

"Without the fear of poverty, no one would be submissive "

Because a conclusion is incorrect do not imply that everything that lead to this conclusion is incorrect.

First, your obviously struggle to convince people. So even if this is the only objective, we have to inform ourselves better to understand what we are missing. This is a better stand, but I think this is still an issue : we don’t really listen people if we think they are wrong.

If our stand is right, this is not an issue to try to prove it wrong. So let’s discuss in order to be proven that vaccines shall not be trusted. I mean, with reliable sources and shit. However personal experiences are reliable sources, but not as much as collective one which and not as scientific consensus.

And their is some serious concerns about vaccines : in Africa, some vaccines campaign was used to use people as test-subject, Falashas has been collectively sterilized. Those are not exception, coloniale and oppressive context regularly use health to justify oppression (on race, gender, sexual orientation or origin).

So if we took what seems obvious to us in order to help, we may just reproduce what other people from the social origins use to oppress. In this conditions, the intuition to oppose to our speech is a good one. To do that, we have to value the knowledge of the exact same people that we may look down upon otherwise

In this case, minorities could learn by themselves, to under another leadership.

Do you know some leading organization that are let concerned people speak, organized and plan their actions, without someone that want to “help them to understand their own conditions” ? I know some organizations dike that, and their are out of the limelight by others. And those others are liberal that think their have the right knowledge and their are need … or vanguard leftists that think they have the right political thinking to analyse the situation.

In both case, they are acting like missionaries (and are their are some historical and sociological link).

You take one example (that is true), but this is not enough. White people could act under the control of the collective; with an imperative mandate of what that person shall talk to, or what line shall that person defend, without asking his mind

I never why we suppose to feel bad about our state in order to oppose to it. Shame do not lead to long term action; feeling bat about a state we do not run imply identify to it. This is an issue, we have to distinguish ourselves (as a collective) from the state.

Another bloody imperialist state

we’ve got plenty of rich to eat

Monitor shall be in place where you can open the store and have no reflections. Otherwise this place make perfect sense

Are cuddle buddies friends or mates ?

What does AES stand for ? I mean the letters, not those states

I think it could be cool. However that shall be asked to sex worker unions first