It will run faster if your local machine is faster than the cloud, but otherwise it’s the same. I don’t think I tried starting CI from my machine, per se, I would instead point codeberg to my machine, push to codeberg, and codeberg would send the job to my local runner. You probably can do it entirely locally.

The main benefit for me was that I can run CUDA workflows without needing to pay extra for GPUs. I’ve not really thought about what happens if you want to deploy to an architecture you don’t own. I can’t recall what architectures they provide.

Note this is with woodpecker CI. I think they’re migrating to a new CI at some point.

deleted by creator

I had a pleasant experience moving my project from github to codeberg. CI is nicer in codeberg because of local runners; easy to migrate too

Hence “vague memory”. I don’t know.

My vague memory is that Signal doesn’t keep that information, so it couldn’t be subpeona’d, indeed they’ve been asked for it before and declined to share.

BUT IT’S MOOT IF YOUR MESSAGES ARE VIEWED by sender or receiver ON ANDROID, WINDOWS OR IOS. Those operating systems can just view everything you type regardless.

curious, thanks for the heads up, time to use my yubikey. I can’t imagine anyone would bother tracking my phone with its niche proprietary OS. 2FA hacking, however …

deleted by creator

i have a dumbphone, suckerrrrs

the best git command

I feel we disagree on a number of fundamental things. We’re not going to get anywhere on a site like this

You mention lots of options. Given people are varied, and you want that in a company, how about letting the candidate decide how to prove themselves? It’s pretty established that it’s not “fair” to stick to a single style, so why hang on to that?

I meant judging people for feeling anxious, as opposed to judging aptitude.

for those who this affects, this lands badly

deleted by creator

Stress is not something you can reason about in the way you imply. It’s an emotional response, and people vary wildly in how they will react. It’s great to hear you don’t get stressed, but judging people who do is, well, concerning.

Live coding in interviews is a completely different experience to pair programming, night and day. I don’t ever recall being asked to code in front of a group.

The article isn’t saying don’t check, it’s saying that live coding interviews are a bad measure.

You seem to be disagreeing with something that isn’t the main point of the article.

That you take those steps doesn’t mean candidates aren’t stressed, despite your intentions.

even better, maintain an account that’s complete lies to throw off their algorithm

(don’t do this - your life matters)

I’m not trusting a regex written by AI

I don’t understand your point. How is it good that the developers thought they were faster? Does that imply anything at all in LLMs’ favour? IMO that makes the situation worse because we’re not only fighting inefficiency, but delusion.

20% slower is substantial. Imagine the effect on the economy if 20% of all output was discarded (or more accurately, spent using electricity).