At least in PG, that is explicitly not the case, unless I’m misunderstanding:
Similarly, a PL/pgSQL loop of the form FOR x IN query LOOP … END LOOP will never use a parallel plan, because the parallel query system is unable to verify that the code in the loop is safe to execute while parallel query is active.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/when-can-parallel-query-be-used.html
At any rate, I feel like it’s questionable design to have a user making row-by-row decisions on hard deletes.
You can just insert directly to the helper/audit table, and delete using it, no need for the cursor loop. If you need a handle to go through the records one by one, something else has already gone wrong.
at least put some foil on the iron, now it’s dirty for the next person
Can’t you already use newlines and whitespace in Excel formulas?
You don’t, but if someone figured out how to do a VM escape surely they would have bigger aspirations than some random torrent
I think trichinosis (sp?) is rare these days, but dunno about all the other wriggly stuff
Sous vide is always an option
Breweries and distilleries commonly offer tours. Just check their website.
There’s a famous case about this. The dude in question fled to Brazil after years of police harassment that followed his activism.
Maggi is akin to soy sauce but tastes different
Wow. That’s pretty bad.
International money transfers, iirc
deleted by creator
I guess it’s the thought that counts
Tech hiring is pretty fucked right now
I replaced my entire tech stack with Postgres