☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆

  • 2.58K Posts
  • 3.04K Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 18th, 2020

help-circle
  • The relevance of Europe stemmed from USSR being the main adversary of the US. Today, it’s clearly China and the US is very openly saying they want to pivot to Asia. In this scenario, normalizing relations with Russia and pulling out of Europe makes perfect sense. The US can’t be everywhere at once, and they have to prioritize now that they’re dealing with multiple peer adversaries in form or Russia and China. Europe simply doesn’t have the relevance that it used to.

    NATO was created to keep Europe subservient to the US, but now there’s a rift in policy towards Russia. The US starting direct talks with Russia is a clear sign that from US perspective Russia is the more important player. Unless Europe knuckles under, then I fully expect the US to abandon it.

    Furthermore, US pulling out of NATO will provide a big stimulus for the military industry in US, which will boost the economy that Trump desperately needs right now. Europe is already in panic and they’re talking about allocating vast amounts of money to defence. Given that Europe lacks any serious military industry, much of that money will go directly to US.

    Another factor here, is that US is not terribly happy about the EU existing. Vance was pretty clear on that point at Munich. With NATO being gone, the US will have an easier time attacking the EU politically. The ideal situation from US perspective would be if EU broke apart and they could deal with individual countries from a position of absolute strength.


  • The notion that Russia will militarily occupy Europe is pure fantasy. However, what’s absolutely certain is that both Russia and the US will exploit the political chaos in Europe caused by collapsing living standards, a crisis Europe itself created. In a twist straight out of Greek tragedy, Europe’s fear of Russian domination has turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    Since 2014, and especially post-2022, the EU has doubled down on a strategy of sweeping sanctions, diplomatic isolation, and moralistic rhetoric in its crusade against Russia. Yet, now it’s Europe that finds itself politically isolated and with its economy collapsing. By cutting itself off from cheap Russian energy, Europe triggered a steep decline in living standards that left the neoliberal political center teetering on the edge. Sanctions intended to harm Russia have instead led to Germany’s deindustrialization, with giants like BASF now shifting production abroad. Russia, on the other hand, successfully pivoted toward the Global South, with major countries like China and India more than making up for any lost trade with Europe.

    After three years of economic war, EU unity is finally starting to fray. Hungary and Slovakia openly defy the EU, Greece and Cyprus veto arms shipments to Kyiv, and that’s just the start. Populist parties across Europe are weaponizing economic pain into anti-EU sentiment. Elections in France, Germany, Czech Republic, and Romania all show nationalist parties steadily gaining momentum. This trend will only grow as the standard of living continues to decline.

    Meanwhile, the US appears to have recognized the end of the unipolar order and has opened dialogue with Russia cutting Europe out of the discussion. Europe’s obsession has left it stranded, lacking the military might to resist realignment or the economic autonomy to chart its own course. Its survival hinges on abandoning its zero-sum vendetta and adapting to the new multipolar world. Unless the EU swaps moral crusades for strategic realism, it risks its own destruction.































  • Yeah mine does not do this, here are the toggles I have on mine which might make a difference

    <think>

    Alright, let me figure out which number is bigger between 9.21 and 9.1999999999. Hmm, okay. Both numbers start with 9. so the whole number part is the same. The difference must be in the decimal parts.

    First, I’ll write them down to compare digit by digit after the decimal point:

    • 9.21 is the same as 9.2100000000 if we extend it to match the same number of decimal places.

    • 9.1999999999 has more 9s in its decimal places.

    Starting from the first decimal digit:

    • The tenths place: both have 2 and 1 respectively. Wait, no—hold on. Let me check again.

    Wait a second, maybe I messed up. Let’s parse each number correctly:

    For 9.21:

    • Tenths place (first after decimal): 2
    • Hundredths place: 1 The rest are zeros beyond that if we need more places.

    For 9.1999999999:

    • Tenths place: 1
    • Then, the hundredths is 9, followed by all those 9s up to the tenth decimal digit?

    Wait, actually let me clarify the positions properly. Let’s write both numbers with enough decimals:

    9.21 can be written as 9.2100000000

    9.1999999999 is already given.

    Comparing digit by digit after the decimal point:

    • Tenths place: 2 vs. 1 → Here, 9.21 has a higher tenths digit (2 > 1).

    Since the first differing digit at the tenths place is already larger for 9.21, there’s no need to look further into the other decimal places because even if all subsequent digits in 9.199… are 9s, they can’t overcome the difference in the tenths place. For example:

    The first number has 0.2 in tenths vs the second having only 0.1. The rest of the decimals add up to less than 0.01 for the second number (since it’s 0.09 + 0.009 etc., which sums to 0.09 repeating, approaching but never reaching 0.1).

    Therefore, even with all those trailing 9s in 9.199…, its value is still less than 9.2 (since it’s like 9.1 plus almost 0.1 but not quite), so 9.21 is larger. </think>

    The number 9.21 is larger than 9.1999999999.

    Here’s why:

    1. Compare the tenths place (first digit after the decimal):
      • 9.21 has a 2 in the tenths place.
      • 9.1999999999 has a 1 in the tenths place.

    Since 2 > 1, 9.21 is already larger at this stage. Even though 9.1999999999 continues with many 9s afterward, they cannot overcome the difference caused by having only 1 in the tenths place compared to the 2 in 9.21.

    Final Answer:

    \boxed{9.21}


  • Well that’s interesting because I got something completely different locally

    <think>
    
    Okay, let me figure out how many times the letter "r" appears in the word "strawberry." First, I'll write down the word to visualize it better: S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y.
    
    Now, I'll go through each letter one by one. Starting with S, T – that's two letters without an R. The third letter is R, so that's one. Then A, W, B, E – those don't have Rs. Next comes another R, making it two. After that, there's another R, bringing the count to three. Finally, the last letters are Y. 
    
    Wait, let me double-check because sometimes I might miscount. Let me break it down again:
    
    S (1), T (2), R (3) – first R here. Then A (4), W (5), B (6), E (7). Next is R again (8) – that's the second R. Another R comes after (9th position?), so third R, and then Y (10). 
    
    Hmm, maybe I confused the positions. Let me spell it out with numbers:
    
    1. S
    2. T
    3. R (1st R)
    4. A
    5. W
    6. B
    7. E
    8. R (2nd R)
    9. R (3rd R)
    10. Y
    
    Yes, so the letters at positions 3, 8, and 9 are Rs. That totals three times. Wait, does "strawberry" have two or three Rs? Let me confirm by spelling it again: S-T-R-A-W-B-E-R-R-Y. Between the B and E, then after that, it's R-R-Y. So there are three Rs total.
    </think>
    
    The letter “r” appears **3 times** in the word "strawberry."  
    
    Here’s the breakdown:  
    S T **R** A W B E **R** **R** Y  
    
    Count ’em: 1 (third letter), 2 (eighth letter), and 3 (ninth letter). 🍓