

We actually don’t know if that would happen. for all we know they could replace him with RFK Jr and take 10x more risk than elon, which would mean even bigger rewards !!!


We actually don’t know if that would happen. for all we know they could replace him with RFK Jr and take 10x more risk than elon, which would mean even bigger rewards !!!


Lol. Oh man after reading that I couldn’t care less. It’s not that your ‘facts’ are wrong, it’s just that what we think are important facts are very different.


“Care” is a strong word, more like morbid curiosity


Okay, now you are changing what I said to continue to make your point that “Elon saved the company” which is very different from your original claim that “Elon provided the vision”.
The haircut unironically gives him credibility in the eyes of investors. That’s how out of touch big money is


All of the good decisions?


Ehh, Tesla was building those things before Musk took over. It’s like the Nazis and the autobahn, these people are taking credit for previous good decisions when they take over.


Or you can start a land war in asia. Talked to a 44 year old on the train who’s basically living at a shelter. He would join the army if they would take him…


If a software project is built better but no one else ever bothers to maintain it, can it even be said to be better?


Well we all don’t have a government pursuing renewable that makes power costs predictably drop over time. Efficiency matters when I’m looking at my power bill thay went up because of a near by data center being built


My bet is these companies are doing layoffs but calling it AI
They also believe a rock can think like a human so…


Let’s say I agree the concept of mind is relative, would you be willing to accept a rock has a mind?
Let me restate the point differently: lowering the bar for what you consider intelligence doesn’t make the AI sound any smarter.


By defaming intelligence you aren’t making the AI sound smarter. But you are making yourself the fool.


“If the west doesn’t build it then China will” is a claim to a timeline. And in the context of governments, most would assume you’re talking about less than 100 years.


Because asking AI to do humans is still uncanny. Pixar and Ghibli was already ruined by AI…


I think what’s interesting is it sounds like the battery is a set of storage containers. My guess is it supports battery swapping, so while the range might be small, it can refuel as part of exchanging cargo


Yes, code harnesses help by providing deterministic feedback like with a language server and reduce the amount of prompting requirements. I guess I should have led with that example 😅
You could throw them into a jumbo jet engine and it still would be a net negative carbon reduction