Cross-posted from “If I can’t dance, it’s not my revolution” by @Db0@dbzer0.com in !dbzer0.com@dbzer0.com


I see tankies keep trying to argue with people about “Actually Existing Socialist” states like USSR and China and try to argue with me or others about how “they were good actually”. It’s bad enough when most of their arguments are whataboutism, but it grinds my gears when I hear then prattle on about all the statistically significant material improvements the life of the people received. It’s like listening to a terminally-liberal prattle on about how “statistically, the life quality actually increased under capitalism”.

Why is this bothering me so much? Because tankies completely suppress the freedom aspects of those states. Sure the improvements in life quality in those nations improved compared to the feudal/agrarian societies they had before, much like liberal capitalism also improved those same metrics.

But the freedom of the populace barely improved improved whatsoever because that freedom is anathema to authoritarian regimes. When anarchists talk about our ideal society, we mean both positive and negative freedom together together. It’s not enough if your health expectancy is increased and infant mortality is reduced, if you have to constantly fear the secret police knocking on your door. It’s not enough to have food on your plate, when the state determines what you can create and where you can work. It’s not enough to get a free car and internet, if your family member got shipped to the concentration camp for criticizing the movement leaders online.

Tankies explicitly avoid this. They are desperate to argue that “authoritarianism is not a thing actually”, hilariously and endlessly promoting the worst socialist essay ever written to justify this. But authoritarianism is very much the crux of the problem here. A society with a hierarchical structure like capitalism or marxism-leninism (i.e. state capitalism) can never be good. It might be better than other states, but it will only get worse and worse as power concentrates to fewer hands and the grip of authority tightens the more control slips through their fingers.

We keep seeing this historically both in liberal and ML states. Clearly material quality of life is not enough to justify the system, or even be stable long-term, when actual human liberty is the sacrifice for it.

  • It looks like it was generated with flux, and was probably generated locally, using less electricity than most modern video games (flux is very energy efficient and fast).

    I’m not well equipped to discuss the theft part of it, but I don’t think it’s fair to call it theft (and I’ll say upfront I’m not prepared to defend that opinion lol)

    Edit: regarding the ‘actual artists’ part- some people use generative AI to make ‘actual art’ and are themselves artists

    • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      As an artist, the training data used for most of the image generators is stolen work. As in, the original artists didn’t give permission for their work to be used that way. Some aren’t stolen, such as adobe’s ai tools, which are trained on imagery that’s licensed for it.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Lol at you promoting corporate Adobe and attacking those use local open source genai. You’re a goddamn tool!

        • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Don’t get me wrong I hate adobe. But. They at least got AI right. These aren’t big corporations you’re “stealing” movies from. They’re everyday people like myself who’s art is being used by AI for training against my wishes.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            I ain’t stealing shit. Nothing I do takes anything away from you. And you’re a tool because you think what adobe is doing is “right”. Because you have no understanding of capitalist power differentials. As if it wouldn’t be a massively worst world for Artists if the only owner of GenAI was adobe and everyone was paying adobe only to use GenAI.

            • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              And who is openAI compensating for their work?

              At least adobe is compensating creators. No other big name AI company is doing that. Anyone who uses AI to make “art” is complicit in this theft.

              The rest of your argument is putting words in my mouth. Do better. AI is hot garbage and a waste of natural resources.