Politico has become the latest target in Elon Musk's clampdown on public spending after it emerged taxpayers were footing the bill for pricey subscriptions to the outlet.
Yep. It’s also possible this is a distraction from us remembering USAID was investigating Starlink in Ukraine for shutting off satellite access to help Russia.
Nothing in the article discusses the legitimacy of the subscriptions. It could simply be a way money was funneled.
Money can be exchanged for goods and services.
If we cannot make a determination of the legitimacy of subscriptions, we equally cannot conclude if it was funneled either.
That’s why I used the word could. In this context it’s used to express possibility.
Yep. It’s also possible this is a distraction from us remembering USAID was investigating Starlink in Ukraine for shutting off satellite access to help Russia.
It is, but it’s far more likely you missed or didn’t understand the word could.
So many possibilities!
There are but the most likely one is you not knowing what could means.
Maybe! The one about the guy getting unrestricted access to the group investigating his company for wrongdoing makes a lot of sense though.
Conspiracy theories must be quite common for people that don’t know what could means.