• Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You say that like that’s never been brought up before. The Mythbusters episode about it even ended on that note. They said “manmade stuff is on the moon, so men must’ve been up there” but didn’t discuss the part where there’s more than one way manmade stuff could end up on the moon (which itself seemed unusually hasty for them).

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You are very ignorant of the truth. Do you think we landed a probe on the moon that was able to take apart and bring back parts of Surveyor 3 in 1969? That would be way more unbelievable than humans doing it instead. What a incredibly stupid and moronic hill you’ve chosen to die on.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s based on the assumption of that being the process of what went on. As I said elsewhere, there seems to be a very unbreakably second-hand nature to this. It is my conclusion, just as yours, your hill, is yours. I’m not attempting to crusade on your own hill so much as I’m stating how people react to hearing what I think.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          They react that way because its unbelievable how someone could actually be as stupid as to deny the moon landing in 2024. “You weren’t there first hand” is not as good as a defense as you think, and you’ve used it over and over. Is that all you’ve got? I haven’t been to the war in Ukraine, but I sure as hell know it’s happening. Are you unable to know something is happening without it being in your face?

          • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then I guess a quarter of Europe is stupid to you. A lot of things fall under the definition of “first-hand”; if I said “here is a moon rock, you can test its properties out”, that would be first-hand, as opposed to “I got a moon-rock as proof, but that doesn’t matter because NASA has it and they’ll never let you test it” or “here is footage, footage means it happened”.

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes, anyone that can’t comprehend that we landed on the moon is stupid, like you. Correct! That is indeed how statistics work.

              Hilarious that you’d link an article that says that it actually happened, too.

              NASA has sent moon rock samples around the globe. They’ve been compared to rocks retrieved by probes and are the same (this was discussed at length in my previous Wikipedia link). But I guess that’s suddenly not going to be good enough for you, you’ll just come up with another reason to die on this hill. At least I can be happy knowing that we really did go to the moon, I’m sorry your brain will never be able to comprehend that amazing fact. It’s sad, when it comes down to it. I feel bad for you.