• HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The main issue is that they communism is economic policy, NOT social policy. While they do go hand in hand people often conflate the two. Many dictatorships use communism as a way to control the people but that doesn’t mean that communism leads directly to dictatorships.

    • Spinnyl@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Communism is an economic fairy tale, not policy.
      It would be nice if it were possible but with the current state of the world, it is not.

      Social democracy is a reasonable compromise.

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is true Communism even possible if it’s being attempted by flawed humans? Seems like it doesn’t matter the economic system so much as the fact that people will ruin anything given enough time.

        • tara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s about incentives. Worker oppression in Monarchy requires a bad King, in Feudalism bad lords, in Capitalism bad shareholders, and in Socialism self-hating workers. If you shared your workplace, would you push to remove your rights? Or to screw over your customers? And then argue for that against everyone else you share power with? The incentives are plainly better in a worker owned economy.

    • Yendor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can’t have a communist economic policy without being authoritarian. It’s human nature - once money is removed as a motivator, society breaks down unless you motivate people some other way (not being sent to the gulag).