• linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Thats a fine slippery slope argument u got there and like always its complete shit, people are people and animals are animals.

    • threeduck@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m not suggesting that animal eating leads to cannibalism, which WOULD be a slippery slope.

      I’m suggesting that if meat eaters are okay with killing and eating animals, why not the human animal? I probe because the line drawn in the sand is unclear with meat eaters.

      Also, humans are animals. This is primary school stuff here.

      What separates eating animals from eating people for you?

        • threeduck@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right, but what’s inherently wrong with eating your own species? I mean, I know, I think any sentient life shouldn’t be killed for my pleasure. But with your logic that some species are okay to kill and eat, and others aren’t, I’m wanting to know why those others aren’t.

          Ignoring “societal norms”, as they’ve been used to commit genocide, slavery, and all manner of atrocities - why is cannibalism logically, in your opinion, bad?

          • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because regardless of what species does it, cannibalism inevitably causes problems due to prions, diseases, and such. Even if the most dangerous parts (Central nervous system) are avoided, there are still problems (just more slowly).

            • threeduck@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well, it doesn’t cause prion diseases, it just spreads them. It’s only transmissible by consumption of conspecifics (or often, as in mad cow disease, by eating similar species - when farmers were feeding cows dead chickens and cows).

              So you’re saying the only thing stopping you from eating factory farmed human meat is the risk to your own safety?

              • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                No, I’m saying that’s the main differentiation between cannibalism and normal meat eating.

                Personally, I have a huge problem with all factory farmed meat, and am mostly vegetarian.

                • threeduck@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So… If there were no risk of disease, you would consider cannibalism and “normal meat eating” to be basically equitable, and equally justifiable? If not, why not?

                  Sorry I’m just having a hard time getting some solid admissions here, nobody wants to just straight up answer.

                  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    As a human, yes I consider a human life to be more valuable than the life of a member of another species. Is that biased? Probably, but if that biased didn’t exist, neither would humans.