But removing Denuvo DRM after 12 weeks ‘causes zero mean total revenue loss.’

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not everybody follows that same diagram.

      On one end of things, many people don’t care at all if a game has Denuvo.

      On the other end, many pirates won’t buy a game they pirated even if they liked playing it.

      • nivellian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Many” so what’s your source for this?

        Also I have bought a bunch of games and I still pirate sometimes what are you talking.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What’s yours? This whole “pirates are also buyers” is just a cop-out, but sure your anecdotic experience is valid proof against the more logical alternative

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Common sense logic kinda dictates that once people have obtained a product, they’re unlikely to go back an pay for the same product even if they liked what they got the first time. The only outlier I have seen, is with small(er) indie games where people are more likely to offer support. Someone pirating a AAA title, liking it and then buying it shortly after at full retail is pretty rare i would say.