• unrealMinotaur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Not well researched on this, but off the top of my head it doesn’t seem like the best policy (disproportionally impacts low income people.) The state still needs to collect money for maibtaining roads, libraries, schools, etc. This is likely coming from stuff like sales tax, etc. People on lower incomes are more likely to spend a higher portion of their income on goods (food, gas, etc.) Since the price of those is semi-fixed relative to income, while those who are of higher income are more likely to save the money. This leads to low income people effectively being taxed more of their wage than high income people. Might be totally wrong though, would really need to look at the policies on this style of taxation and if it makes any sense. What probably matters most is where the governments revenue is actually coming from.

    • yodeljunkmanenvy@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      New Hampshire has no sales tax either. At the local level we have property tax.  We also collect a decent amount of money from toll roads, a tax on liquor, a tax on gambling profits and a tax on hotel stays and restaurants.  Oh and there is a payroll tax.

      As you can see, we rely more on user fees than broad based taxes.  The way to lower your taxes is to not partake in these services.

      As you mentioned, both income and sales tax are basically a tax on living your normal life.