Well, ackshually, Linux is just a kernel… /s
Well, ackshually, Linux is just a kernel… /s
You know what? A young Fassbender would have been a great Feyd-Rautha.
I mean, McAvoy was the God Emperor…
After the USS Liberty, Israel realized it has carte blanche.
The rich will just insist on higher immigration levels in order to bolster demand.
See: Canada.
As opposed to the Republican’s Final Solution?
“Beaver Fever” is the occasional Canadianism I’ve heard, although its specifically for giardiasis.
And this is why the rich are trying so hard to get right wing governments elected worldwide.
They know they’re running out of runway, and the next few years could be their last chance.
I’m not saying the usual crop of centrist ditherers are great, but they’re better than fascists bought and paid for by tax dodging tech bros.
I’m going to say Win8 & 8.1.
Say what you will about the UI, they did great work on the underlying kernel, file system and APIs. If they’d continued to refine it, it’d be damn near perfect.
They really started to lose the plot with 10; it kept a lot of what made 8 good (and steals a lot of goodwill from 8) but you can see the adware and telemetry start to creep in.
The next best I’d have to give to Vista, which also did some much needed revitalization, only to see 7 get the glory because Microsoft flubbed the hardware requirements and vendors were sloppy with drivers.
My favourite is NT3.5: full microkernel, no GDI in kernel space, no printer drivers in the kernel, less registry issues. We’d have skipped a lot of pain from the 90s and 2000s had Microsoft not went backwards with 9x and NT4.
NT 3.5 was the last version I’d consider “good” without reservation.
Ugh…
How did PCs beat out the Amiga, Mac and ST with nonsense like that?
Can you quantify why you don’t like Mozilla?
I understand why someone might find Firefox itself subpar in some cases, but I’d like to hear what your issues with the organization are.