• redut_nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In the US, but basically it is a global phenomenon, government spending is out of control and unsustainable - Argentina showed us the way.
    Wish we had DOGE in the EU. We need less unproductive bureaucrats not more.

    • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Maybe, and I say maybe, before starting to dismantle core-agencies needed for the maintenance and management of a state, one should look into the meddling between private and public interests. Like, how muvh of our money is being used to sustain dead-end projects such as Ai development or fossil fuel? Do we want to also look into the military spending and the paths grants provided to this end follow?

      If Argentina has taught us anything is that leaving citizens without services makes the lives of those same citizens even worse. The results of no hospital, schools, or state management agencies will be shown in some years, can’t wait to see libertarians trying to spin that situation in a positive way

          • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The fact that you think that’s the extent of AI development means you’re not informed enough to really comment on this issue. LLMs are only one from of AI. And the fact that they can now recognize natural language is a huge boost in itself.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Large Language Models are the form of so-called “AI” that’s being crammed into everything at our expense.

              The stuff that’s actually useful, like engineering and bioscience models, are not getting trillions in investments in the hopes that they’ll render the majority of the population unemployable.

              • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                That’s the most visible thing. It’s not the only thing. And the cool thing about AI models is that they can be run together in various ways to commitment each other. It’s not a zero sum game

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Dude, wtf are you talking about?

                  When people complain about “AI” they aren’t talking about aerodynamics simulators, they’re talking about LLMs built on stolen content for the express purpose of stealing jobs and recommendation algorithms designed to push people into fascist politics for the engagement numbers. Those are entirely a zero-sum game where corporate gains can only be achieved by consumer losses.

                  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Because people are largely ignorant and latch onto buzzwords that the media repeats endlessly without understanding what’s going on behind the scenes.

                    Fascist Recommendation engines existed long before any of this LLM business.

                    Stopping technological progress because bad people might do bad things with it, is attacking the problem the wrong way. Stop the bad people, not the technology. Replacing jobs/reducing the burden on people to labor isn’t a bad thing if we can prevent all the riches going to a few wealthy owners.

      • redut_nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Nope. Argentina is recovering from the illness of socialism.

        • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Oh yes, cut spending by eliminating agencies needed by the people to have a decent life in a developed society and present the resulting savings as a victory.

          It’s like a company manager firing most of its employees and selling it’s machines presenting the administrative books at the next shareholders meeting. Much profits, wow! And then the year after the company goes bankrupt and foreclose, who can say why this has happened??? Must have been the invisible hand free market!!! Fs fs, on god

          • redut_nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Bureaucrats don’t produce they leech. Free markets improve lives of ordinary citizens not paper pushers.

            • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 hours ago

              We don’t have a free market. And letting the business owners do the ransacking will make it even less of a free market. You’re over here rooting for corporate capture.

              Elon just awarded himself 100s of millions in government contacts for cars that fucking fall apart. He’s dumping his trash product off on you, the taxpayer’s dime. And you’re cheering him on

            • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Yeah buddy, sure. I’m certain without rules and laws all companies would act in the best interests of the consumers, not selling dangerous or poisonous goods at all!! And they would never think about creating cartels to fix the prices of their products. This could never happen!!

              God, you’re thick as a brick but less useful. Basically a rock with the capacity to write dumb things on the internet

                • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Wrong facts but facts nevertheless.

                  Please tell me how the absence of laws and agencies mandated to overview the adherence to said laws by big industrial realities could improve the quality of live for common citizens who are already power-deprived in front of big corporations thanks to the lack in founding of state agencies in return for the campaign contributions all parties rack in from their wealthy donors with each election cycle

                  Pro-difficulty: use your words instead of linking to a badly argued YouTube video

                  Protip: you can’t

                  • redut_nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    Because Thomas Sowell can tell it so much better with countless historic examples than I can and btw - it is not a ‘youtube video’ - it is a link to a rumble video with the complete audiobook. It just shows you how an economy works and the effects (negative and positive) of governments. One of the best books ever written on this subject. Highly recommended for everyone - left or right.

                    Don’t be scared, he is not an anarchist.