redut_nl to Conservative@lemm.ee · edit-25 days agoOver 20M 'people' listed as 100+ years old in the SS database?www.msn.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down150file-text
arrow-up1-37arrow-down1external-linkOver 20M 'people' listed as 100+ years old in the SS database?www.msn.comredut_nl to Conservative@lemm.ee · edit-25 days agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
Massive fraud "red flag”, could also be a matter of data integrity issues. Anyway another example why DOGE is needed.
minus-squareHorreC@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·4 days agoI mean keeping all the data is needed. Those numbers are tied to people dead or not, you cant reuse them. So yes keeping a record of each number and its accounting was a massive undertaking and was stated when they implemented it.
I mean keeping all the data is needed. Those numbers are tied to people dead or not, you cant reuse them. So yes keeping a record of each number and its accounting was a massive undertaking and was stated when they implemented it.