Terrifying

  • slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel Don’t Create The Torment Nexus”

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Maybe a weird aside, but what does this mean?

    pushing fluid at 40 standard liters per minute.

    Are there “liters” other than the 10cm x 10cm x 10cm definition?

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Thanks, you succeeded hahaha.

        From what I’m reading there this is a measure of mass flow rate of gas, expressed as volume per minute at some standard volume and pressure. Which makes some sense, you need those two parameters to be fixed so you can measure mass by volume.

        And then I realized the OP article uses it for a fluid 😂

    • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Volume changes based on temperature and pressure. So when we reference volume measurements like for flow rates, we typically do the math to adjust those to standard temperature and pressure. Standard pressure is 1 atm but standard temperature varies based on who you’re talking to because of competing standards. It’s usually 25 C or 20 C.

      When we want to reference the non temperature and pressure corrected volume, we append actual to it so that people know what the measurement is. Some people don’t do that and that causes confusion for others using their work if the reading is standard or actual.

      • Yttra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They’re asking why it’s “standard litres per minute”, instead of just “litres per minute”

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Oh, well yeah Standard liters per minute or SLM, specifically refers to flow rates measured in the U.S.

          So the “other” measurement would evidently be Europes “Normal liters per minute”.

          What the difference is, I couldn’t tell you.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They really did go for the “horror movie about to go very wrong” aesthetic when they made those videos, didn’t they.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Let’s ensure we also make household robots unreasonably strong and durable. We don’t want shotgun wielding humans to be able to disable one, or barricade in a house.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s clear they made this weird on purpose but still, so many questions…

    the robot hangs suspended from the ceiling as its limbs twitch and kick, marking what the company claims is a step toward its goal of creating household-helper robots

    Oh yeah, definitely a huge step in that direction…

    Clone Robotics designed the Protoclone with a polymer skeleton that replicates 206 human bones

    That’s all of the bones of an human adult. Yeah, I’m sure absolutely all of them were necessary.

    • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s all of the bones of an human adult. Yeah, I’m sure absolutely all of them were necessary.

      Are you trying to imply they gave it a dick? If so they don’t have bones in them.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        No, it’s pretty much only you thinking that. The rest of us were thinking about the 6 tiny bones in the ears only used for hearing or dozens of weird little bones in the wrists and ankles.

        • brsrklf@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Exactly, ear in particular was what I thought about. There are very tiny bones in there. I’m pretty sure they didn’t replicate a functional human ear, so those have no impact on anything.

          Many bones in the hand and foot are also locked in place together, so modeling each one seems, well, I don’t think it’s a waste of time, but at this point you’re making an art performance.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I have literally no idea how that came to your mind immediately. It’s very funny to me that it did though.

    • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t understand these companies’ obsession with humanoid robots. A robot doesn’t have to humanoid to be a useful household helper. It doesn’t even have to be humanoid for people to form a friendly bond with it (something I think would be a good quality in a “household helper”) just look at Star Wars droids

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Some of this is also about less complicated ways to use patents that can also be applied to things like prosthetic limbs.

        Also, it provides a control case with how well-studied human anatomy is. In terms of basic mechanical motion, there’s a clear baseline goal.

        I remember seeing early versions of the synthetic muscle fibers years ago, but as far as ways to practically apply them and test, and refine them as control technology improves with machine learning. 10-15 years ago, this wasn’t really possible.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        A humanoid robot can operate in the existing world. It can climb stairs and open a door, for example. A robot on wheels without arms can’t do that.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        if you want it to interact with a wide range of environments and objects that were designed for humans, then a humanoid robot may be the way to go.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Maybe they’re attempting to make it ‘learn’ how to move itself using neural networking instead of programming discrete movement presets.

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          the only thing I’m hoping for is that this can serve as a proof of concept that human brains might be able to learn to control limbs made of synthetic muscles like that…

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s definitely made that accurate/creepy for marketing reasons, they’re probably hoping this will help them get investors. I would also assume you can simplify the human body design a good bit before losing the functionality we actually want from something like this.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How is it going to balance if it does not have a fake cochlea? /s