cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agoCoin-sized nuclear 3V battery with 50-year lifespan enters mass productionwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down19cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkCoin-sized nuclear 3V battery with 50-year lifespan enters mass productionwww.techspot.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·22 hours agoGoogle says a Casio watch needs .004mA so not quite enough.
minus-squarednick@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·21 hours agoDid you typo or did he? .03 is significantly bigger than .004
minus-squareLibra00@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·21 hours ago0.03 is 7.5x more than 0.004 tho?
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·21 hours agoYou are right! I didn’t count the 0’s!
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-222 hours agoThat’s definitely in the ballpark though. Surely they could cut 25% power draw to support a 50 year battery.
minus-squaremesa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 hours agoI wonder how much we really need for a clock (555 eq) to work?
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·21 hours agohttps://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/LM555 2mA minimum, and that’s just q current. It’s gonna be much higher when you’re actually using it for a clock. I’m sure the casio’s main power sink is the display. I bet the refresh rate could be reduced for better battery life.
minus-squareTangent5280@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·21 hours agoIsnt the refresh rate just 1 Hz?
minus-squarecubism_pitta@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-221 hours agoA lot more than that. 2ma Analog circuits are weird though https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ne555.pdf
Google says a Casio watch needs .004mA so not quite enough.
Did you typo or did he? .03 is significantly bigger than .004
0.03 is 7.5x more than 0.004 tho?
You are right! I didn’t count the 0’s!
That’s definitely in the ballpark though. Surely they could cut 25% power draw to support a 50 year battery.
I wonder how much we really need for a clock (555 eq) to work?
https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/LM555
2mA minimum, and that’s just q current. It’s gonna be much higher when you’re actually using it for a clock.
I’m sure the casio’s main power sink is the display. I bet the refresh rate could be reduced for better battery life.
Isnt the refresh rate just 1 Hz?
Yep.
A lot more than that. 2ma
Analog circuits are weird though
https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ne555.pdf