Range

  • Small battery range: 240km
  • Big battery range: 385km

Motor

  • Motor: Single motor, rear wheel drive
  • Power: 150kW
  • Torque: 264Nm
  • 0-100km: 8s
  • Top speed: 145km/h

Dimensions

  • Bed length: 1.5m
  • Vehicle length: 4.4m
  • Vehicle height: 1.8m
  • Vehicle width: 1.8m

Comparison

  • 2025 Kia Niro length: 4.4m
  • 2025 Ford Maverick length: 5.1m
  • 1985 Toyota Pickup/Hilux length: 4.7m

Weights

  • Curb weight 1634kg
  • Max payload 650kg
  • Max towing 454kg

Charging

  • Port: NACS
  • Onboard charger: 11kW
  • Level 1 AC, 3.6kw, 20-100%: 11h
  • Level 2 AC, 11kW, 20-100%: under 5h
  • Level 3 DC, 120kW, 20-80%: under 30m

Safety

  • Traction Control
  • Electronic Stability Control
  • Forward Collision Warning
  • Automatic Emergency Braking
  • 2-stage Driver/Passenger Airbags
  • Full Length Side Curtain Airbags (Truck 2) (SUV 4)
  • Seat Side Airbags (2)
  • Backup Camera
  • Pedestrian Identification
  • Auto High Beam

More info

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    Something like this I imagine I’d be happy with. A sedan/crossover and this. Wouldn’t take it out the county. Just trips to hardware/gardening stores and moving furniture. More than enough range and speed to go to work too. Any long drive I’d probably get an Accord hybrid or something. 2 vehicle family

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Cool but now I’m worried this is being spammed everywhere. New capitalism marketing at foot?

  • Psythik@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Can someone please convert some of these numbers to freedom units? Specifically the range, horsepower, torque, and 0-60 numbers?

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      0-60mph is mostly deprecated these days in favor of 0-62mph, which just so happens to be the same as 0-100km/h — what a coincidence!

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I’m aware of this, and it’s not the same because there is a 2 MPH difference. So the 0-60 number will be smaller, albeit slightly.

  • ⛓️‍💥@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Very interesting, but please give me power windows and a dumb infotainment unit that does Android Auto/CarPlay. No Internet connection. No integration with the rest of the car.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I struggle to understand the point of a truck that can only tow 500kg… that and such awful range. If the range were doubled this would be a great deal, but as is it’s just dead in the water.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s because you’re thinking of trucks used first and foremost for heavy duty “truck stuff.” That is not the only market for trucks, at least in the US: https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-size-pickup-truck-you-need-a-cowboy-costume

      According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It can probably tow more, usually 500 kg is like the bare minimum for American cars. Also us towing standards are a bit more strict. A car in the EU is rated to tow more than a car in the US, even if it’s identical.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Even if it were 1000kg, that’s still way below what a truck would want to tow though.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Low towing capacity and an outrageously miserable bed size. Less than five feet? The powertrain of this should have been put in a station wagon, not a “truck.”

    • Altrex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah, this is my issue with the government incentives for EVs, especially now that they are more common and can be deducted from the sale price. Most retailers are just jacking up the price to whatever the cap for the rebate is while pretending it’s still a good deal.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        This is the same argument used for blaming the cost of college on government loans for education, for $$$ housing prices in cities that offer low income subsidies, for food prices due to food stamps…

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I hardly think $27.5k could be considered “jacking up the price” but I also don’t appreciate advertising pricing that is dependent on a government incentive that may not even exist when the vehicles are actually delivered.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Curb weight 1634kg

    This was the standout spec that might make me consider one.

    I’ve been looking mainly at small hatchbacks/SUVs, and they all seem to weigh in at over 1800kg. And many are over 2000kg. Excluding Aptera…

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Weight affects basically everything. Less weight means less cost to buy, better range, better handling, less cost of maintenance (brakes, tires, etc), better safety, less getting stuck off-road, and so on…

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          +1

          Weight is everything. Removing it makes almost literally every aspect of a car better, and it’s usually a terrible negative for EVs.

          • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Interesting! I must say I never considered it. My kia soul EV was heavy but handled very well. Loved that thing.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Oh yeah, its more than that. Low weight helps acceleration, braking (so safety), handling, range, wear on every component, and most of all, cost. The same sized tires will need less pressure, wear much less, and grip harder. If the car is lighter, you don’t need as stiff a chassis, nor as much braking to lock the wheels, less battery, motor, which means you can take even more weight off the car… You get where I’m going.

              Racecars are fast because they are light, not because they have big engines and expensive bodies. Little 1500lb cars can lap a $3 million 1500hp (and quite heavy, because of all the stuff in it) Bugatti around a track.

              Heavy cars can handle OK, but the cost is big.

            • notthebees@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              EVs have a very low COG due to the batteries being at the bottom of the car. This is a good thing for handling but making them lighter would be even better.

  • 🍪CRUMBGRABBER🍪@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    After seeing announcements and headlines like this for over 10 years and just about nothing available for sale I just kind of yawn Now. Good way to raise some venture capital though. does it have AI? let’s do this

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tbh, I’m super into this. Especially if the range could be extended slightly or if the truck is somewhat hackable.

    But then… Bezos. Ugh.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Aside from being backed by Bezos, this seems like Lemmy the car. Under 20K, an EV, no stupid touch screen, designed to be repaired and modded, and even crank windows.

    I bet the catch, aside from Bezos, is the range or charge speed.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It will need to have a screen to comply with safety standards. A back up camera is mandatory.

      The Citroen Ami is a “cycle car” under French law and doesn’t have to meet the same standards.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I don’t think that it has a cell modem, either, because it sounds like it eschews a baked-in entertainment computer:

      https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a64564869/2027-slate-truck-revealed/

      Roll-down windows come standard, as do manually adjustable rearview mirrors. An audio or infotainment system is noticeably missing, too. Instead, your cellphone or tablet serves these functions, with a dock for the former included and one for the latter available as an optional accessory. Better like the sound coming out from your phone or tablet’s speakers, too, because the Slate lacks speakers, though the brand’s accessory division will gladly hook you up with a set.

      Honestly, if you took my last year of comments complaining about privacy-infringing cars and those complaining about changes to what a truck is, this does kind of look to be addressing both. Gotta see what the actual production vehicle is like in real life, of course, but…

      https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/advice/mini-truckin-returns-slate-unveils-old-school-style-affordable-electric-pickup

      When I say the truck is small, I mean it. At 174.6 inches, it’s about 2 feet shorter in overall length than the 2025 Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz. And to use the Wayback Machine to a time when compact pickups were actually compact, it’s roughly the same size as the compact pickups of 1980: the Toyota truck, Chevy LUV and Ford Courier. Notably, no other automakers have offered trucks of this size in America since the mid 1990s.

      Yeah, like the “inexpensive, no-frills utility vehicle” that pickups originally were.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        2 days ago

        because the Slate lacks speakers,

        I mean, I get they need to cut costs, but come on… a damn radio wouldnt have killed them

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Didn’t some Scions come with no radio? The idea being they were targeted at younger folks who were more likely to customize their stereo, so “no stereo, but all the speaker grilles and mount points for one” is a bit like the “no operating system -$211” option on a Laptop. Happy Linux user noises.

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Honestly, as long as it’s easily DIY upgradable (accessible speaker mounting locations, standard DIN panels, etc) I am all for this. Most OEM audio systems are stupidly overpriced and suck complete donkey balls compared to what you can get for a few hundred bucks at Crutchfield and install in an afternoon.

          For the last 20 years or so, most factory audio systems are so integrated into the rest of the electronics that they can be an absolute nightmare to upgrade unless you are a pro, which means you get the worst of both worlds: garbage audio, AND a steep upgrade path.

          • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            I agree, and everyone basically want Apple/Android CarPlay units anyway. The hard part will be getting a wiring harness installed, unless there is some space provided in the dash (putting speakers or anything else in a door is really annoying for the experienced, and too tall an order for the beginner.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Citroen AMI doesn’t have speakers either, it comes with a Bluetooth speaker instead, which you can use outside the car. It makes sense if you just think of the entertainment stuff as something that shouldn’t be part of the car and can easily be upgraded/replaced down the line.

          • applemao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Agreed. It’s a car. I have an entertainment system at home and great speakers for listening. Cars suck for actual listening quality anyways.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You spent hours in that thing and phone speakers are not made to be louder than traffic and drive noises, especially not for so long. Also a radio offers traffic and accident news from local stations. And if they cheap out on speakers I am quite sure they also don’t offer USB ports to charge the phone you run in lieu of a build in system

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              I am quite sure they also don’t offer USB ports to charge the phone you run in lieu of a build in system

              I definitely read an article somewhere where it says that they provide USB power for the tablet/phone.

              kagis

              This article has it:

              https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a64580484/slate-truck-ev-pickup-truck-suv/

              The Truck will come with a phone mount and convenient USB power to mount your phone or a tablet to the dash.

              EDIT: I think that a better criticism is that this thing is just a prototype, still almost two years away from mass production, assuming everything goes right for them. Like, they could have any number of things go wrong (the Trump tariff situation, for one…hard to have any idea where things will be). It could be that they crash into problems trying to get mass production going. It could be that they can’t hit their target price point.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                They shouldn’t be an upgrade. Basic speakers are like 50 bucks, for an item that costs 20k, thats a drop in the bucket

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 hours ago

                  This vehicle is clearly meant as an errand truck, not a roadtripper. It wasn’t that long ago when base model work trucks didn’t have a radio or speakers installed.

                  Quit getting pissy over something that doesn’t even exist yet.

      • applemao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        100% in agreement with all your points. Simplicity and modular! Look how well the original mustang did, because you could actually get what you wanted. That has disappeared completely now

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t think that it has a cell modem, either

        So it’s not coming to Europe then.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is there a requirement for big brother data tracking over there?

            • futatorius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              …and that system is only activated in case of an accident. The spec explicitly states that there is no continuous tracking of vehicle position or other parameters.

              • barryamelton@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                They sell emergency car lights that you pop up on top of the car ala secret police (but yellow). They have a modem that when activated automatically notifies the road services of you being there stopped.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                Possibly, technical inspections. I’m not sure whether it’s a requirement for cars to be street legal or just a requirement for cars to be sold on the market. The regulation only mentions that it’s about type approval but it’s not like modifying a car automatically nullifies its type approval.

                Certainly would be hard to argue for authorities that snipping the eCall would endanger others, similar situation as with seat belts I don’t think legislation is unified there.

          • Hubi@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No but the emergency assistant system is required, and for that you need a cell modem.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No, the catch is that it isn’t real.

      @ me when it’s rolling off the production line.
      Until then…

      it will have
      you will be able to

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As long as it gets 50+ miles range reliably in winter, it’s perfect as a commuter/weekend project truck. I generally look for 150 miles range for this, since winter can cut effective range in half. I don’t care about charge speed since I’ll just plug it in at night.

    • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Standard Range (52.7 kWh) (est.): 150 miles

      seems like but manageable for most people

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It’s 150 miles of rated range, presumably according to the EPA standard, just like every other EV is rated. The EPA standards have recently been updated to reflect more accurately.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yes, and yet it is still so very far from reality when it comes to BEVs. It’s fine when comparing cars because it’s a well defined standard, but it’s terrible at indicating actual range especially if you don’t live in dry warm climate.

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              It’s really not. You can’t account for climate with a single number. That’s why standards exist.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          They do say that they also offer a larger battery pack with a 240 mi range, but yeah, even so, it’s not gonna be a great vehicle for long-distance highway travel compared to a current ICE vehicle. Fine for a commuter, though.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      well its less it doesnt have a touch screen, the touch screen is an optional purchase.

      the range iirc in some overview is 2 options, one was i think 150mi, the other was 240mi

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No, there is no optional touch screen. The one featured in their media is a phone/iPad running the Slate app.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        From my other link, I don’t think that the touch screen is an optional purchase. I don’t think that they’re selling any entertainment computer to have a screen on. It says that they come standard with a smartphone mounting point or optionally with a tablet mounting point. But the car computer is bring-your-own, and not built into the car. Which…is what I’ve wanted, because computers age out a lot more quickly than cars do.

        I assume that there’ll be an OBD-II slot that one can hook up to to feed data about the car to the phone/tablet. There’s software that can make use of that. Dunno if there’s any other data typically exposed to car computers other than what that provides.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          China is already making better cars for way less, but I guess the good thing for them is that they won’t sell to the US.

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is actually pretty cool and makes sense. Can’t wait to see what the 3D printer community does with this if the dash can be customized with accessories. Anyone know when a test drive would be covered?

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please keep in mind that this is after tax incentives. So let’s just assume the tax incentives are zero and call it 27,000 just to be on the safe side.

  • paequ2@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    One thing that makes me nervous is that there are so many screws exposed. It seems like it would be really easy for thieves to just walk up with a hex key and steal your bumper or panels… 🤔

    • sulgoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The panels are plastic, so while this is a concern, they probably wouldn’t get much for them. Bumper I’m less sure about.

      • paequ2@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        A buddy of mine got his Tacoma tailgate stolen in broad daylight during a kid’s football game… I hope any really valuable parts are secured…

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Use some Rokset on all your fasteners; the only way to break the threadlocker is with heat, and heat would also destroy the bodywork. So you could still replace damaged panels, but you couldn’t steal them.