The subjects that you can’t even bring up without getting downvoted, banned, fired, expelled, cancelled etc.

  • AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    For legal reasons I cannot have any opinion on the following: Gestures broadly at everything in the Middle East

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are more than welcome to choose from one of the pre-prepared opinions that we have on offer here… no need to bring anything new to the table and confuse such an obviously binary subject.

  • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    “ChatGpt is really good if you use it properly”

    Gets torrents of down votes every time. But I literally use it a lot at work and it’s brilliant.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends what you use it for. If you are trying to provide something informational, I do not trust chat gpt.

      If you use it to respond to work emails because they force communication for the sake of communication, then its fine.

      • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I used it to help me create a level 10 DND character for a one shot and it was great for that

      • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So, if you use it properly. Just like you wouldn’t use a fork for soup despite it being a utensil and food. Using a tool for what it’s good at and avoiding using it for things it’s bad at is part of using it properly.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d probably also develop a short temper about spanners too if they were being shoved in my face by tech companies as hard as chat bots are

        • egrets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          2 months ago

          We’re excited to announce the new Sony WH1000XM6 headphones, enhanced by the power of spanners!

          I don’t see why my headphones need a sp-

          Conveniently built in to your headset, you can use the spanner to adjust bolt tightness on-the-go!

          Okay, but that’s not wh-

          We’re proud to be leading the market in spanner-augmented products to bring a new level of convenience to your life.

          Spanner may sometimes only appear to tighten bolts. Please don’t ask us the energy cost of manufacturing the spanner.

    • infinite_ass@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d call it a cultural artifact. We used to get married very young. In some cultures the kids are introduced to sex by the grandparents. And of course in our own culture the ideal of sexy beauty is a supermodel who looks like a 13 year old boy. It’s a whirlwind wrapped in a psychosis for sure.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I chalk this up to not having a word to describe folks suffering from the condition as opposed to predators acting on their condition (or even predators just abusing children regardless of attraction). For a ton of people they use the word pedophile to mean someone who sexually abuses children. Because as soon as nuanced discussion about “pedophiles who don’t abuse kids” come up, people accuse you of “defending pedophiles” but they use it to mean “defending people who abuse children.”

    • moistclump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Economics doesn’t seem as big of a thing as the other 3. Anyone who’s nerdy enough to talk economics without making it political could probably have a pretty good discussion. I vote we change it to Elephants. Religion, Abotion, Politics, Elephants, or Rape.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Economics is poorly understood by the vast majority of Americans. To most people, it is purely political.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Economics is purely political.
          Politics is almost entirely about allocation of money and trying to influence the economy.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fact i can tell you using economic theory its a good idea to make people unemployed as the cost of living increases, that rent controls are a really bad idea, and even ignoring profit its probably wise to increase the costs of tickets to shows and events makes me very unpopular

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    I fucking hate React. It’s slow, verbose, and unpleasant to work with. It’s all the worst parts of Java brought over to JavaScript. That being said, it’s still better than Angular.

    • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wouldn’t mind switching to alternative libraries like Svelte or Solid but can’t imagine going back to plain Javascript for complex applications. It’s a pain in the ass, even with jQuery.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I use Svelte, and I love it. Although I’m not a huge fan of the new Runes syntax. It’ll probably grow on me though.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s so much boilerplate to even do the most simple tasks. And that boilerplate is something that could usually be automatically added by a compiler.

        That kind of stuff often introduces footguns.

    • Cratermaker@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think what started me down the anti-React path was realizing that there were other frameworks out there that don’t even use a virtual dom. Plus you get tired of being told that the most obvious and intuitive way to do various things in React actually goes against some best practice that they’ve established.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    On lemmy?

    • Two-space indent (as superior to tab indent)

    • Hey, by the way, your comment was kinda racist

    • I’m a new user and why isn’t this more like reddit

    • I’m pretty okay with capitalism, actually

    • Here’s video without text summary (NB: this one is, IMO, entirely deserving of downvotes)

    • Finadil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Maybe I’m just old school, but I’m two spaces for life. I will die on this fucking hill. If you use tabs after just a couple indents all the code is off screen. I ain’t trying to scroll in two dimensions all the time.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      +1 for the video issue, or any other “just do [insert a bunch of work here], it’s less work than commenting anyways” kinda stuff

    • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      + Here’s video without text summary

      I really don’t get why people get so upset about that. We don’t get summaries on Youtube either but still watch the videos.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago
        1. We go to youtube to watch videos. We go to lemmy comments to read text.

        2. Youtube videos DO have descriptions, though?

        • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago
          1. Sure, if it’s just a bare link in the comments I understand, but as a post with the original video title and usually an autogenerated thumbnail, I don’t see a problem.
          2. The YT descriptions are not shown in the list of videos and rarely contain a summary of the video.
  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    People of color seem to perform amazing in athletics compared to other races in America (see: American football, basketball). Makes me think that Americans hyper-evolved their slaves by selective breeding. Unfortunate and extremely unethical, but maybe possible? Idk.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s possible it’s for other reasons, though. Black Americans are generally poorer than other Americans, and success in sports is a ticket out of poverty that is accessible to people in that position. It could also be a cultural thing; I doubt Finns are genetically predisposed to be exceptional drivers, but they are still wildly over-represented at the top level of motorsports for such a small population

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’d believe it if a good portion of black americans I’ve seen are tall and muscular, but I’d say their proportions are similar to their white american counterparts, i.e. a spectrum.

      I think they just want it more, and its one of the few paths to success they have.

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        That actually can be explained by the slaves that used to live in the farmhouses. They were treated as an elevated status and allowed to eat more. Think like the “aunts” for the children; caretakers.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          But they were exceptions, not the majority who were slaves/workers. You’d still expect a heavy selection bias for good body attributes if you sampled them at random, assuming OP’s hypothesis is true.

    • infinite_ass@leminal.spaceOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I heard that a similar breeding program happened in some African cultures back in the day. Like you could only breed if you were an alpha hunter or somesuch.

      So that’s how you get a race of 7’ tall dudes

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      i think much more likely is the opposite happened. Europeans inbred themselves into infirmity and have simply yet to recover from all that nonsense fully hundreds of years later. As a pastey removed myself i can say the amount of genetic conditions i have is mind boggling. Its not that POC are especially good at sports its that white people are especially bad.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    All drugs should be legal and regulated.

    Is it worth it, drug warriors? All the unnecessary deaths at the hands of police/gangs/cartels and unregulated drugs of a unknown potency? Was it worth sacrificing all our civil liberties on the vain funeral pyre that is the United States of America?

    When humanity is victorious in the drug war and all drugs are legalized, will drug users criminalize sobriety?

    Will people high as fuck demand everyone to piss in a plastic cup to make sure they are high?

    Will drug users ruin sober people’s lives with felonies and time in prison with hardened criminals?

    Will drug users dissolve civil liberties and prop up a bipartisan police state that gives cops a license to kill?

    NO!

    Who would want to do that to someone? To a fellow human for doing what they want with their own bodies? Prohibitionists… that’s who. And we are not them

    Nothing lasts forever drug warriors. Tick tock. We will be free one day, and you will wail and moan and your cries will fall on deaf ears.

    Get fucked prohibitionists. Feel fortunate we want justice, not retribution.

    Now playing The War on Drugs - Red Eyes

    • BreadOven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know it’s very on the nose and has other themes in it. But the root cause is all the same. Reagan. This is the song I thought of reading the post:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lIqNjC1RKU

      I don’t necessarily agree with everything said in the song, but I think we can all agree (to quote the song) “I’m glad Reagan dead”.

    • Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’ve caused a lot of damage though restricting access would likely help with that. (Things like this usually get quite a few downvotes in my experience tbh so maybe it goes both ways)

      My pretty spontaneous solution compromise would be to legalize more things but keep them well regulated to avoid addiction and transition to similar regulations for already legal drugs. This seems like a solution that more people would be happy with. Obviously there would need to be help for people already addicted at least for drugs with similar withdrawal symptoms as alcohol.

      • Ars Fireside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, it is controversial, unfortunately. I never understood the logic behind calling piracy a theft, because nothing actually gets stolen, only copied.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      For what it’s worth, I’ve personally never found it controversial to talk about in person. And this includes in countries where it’s a prosecuted crime.

      Copying is not theft, artificial scarcity in the digital world is a tragedy, and I intentionally avoid paying middle-men distributors (like streaming services and record companies) for art.